Zhou T J, White P F, Chiu J W, Joshi G P, Dullye K K, Duffy L L, Tongier W K
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Aug;85(2):246-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.2.246.
We compared onset and offset of action and tracheal intubating conditions after rapacuronium and rocuronium in 60 patients in a randomized, assessor-blinded study. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mg kg-1, either rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg-1 (n = 30) or rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 (n = 30) was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with either a propofol infusion (100 micrograms kg-1 min-1) or sevoflurane (1% end-tidal) with 66% nitrous oxide (N2O), n = 15 in each subgroup. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed using an electromyographic (EMG) device (Datex Relaxograph). The lag times (mean 42 (SD 11) s and 44 (16) s), maximum block (99 (2)% and 98 (3)%) and intubating conditions at 60 s (good-to-excellent in 86% and 84% of patients) were similar for rapacuronium and rocuronium, respectively. The onset time of rapacuronium was shorter than rocuronium (87 (20) vs 141 (65) s, P < 0.001), and the degree of block at 60 s was greater (69 (26) vs 50 (27)%, P < 0.05). Twenty-five per cent recovery was shorter with rapacuronium than rocuronium during propofol (15.0 (3.2) vs 39.1 (14.2) min, P < 0.001) and sevoflurane (15.1 (4.2) vs 47.8 (19.0) min, P < 0.001) anaesthesia. We conclude that rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg-1 had a more rapid onset, similar intubating conditions, and shorter recovery times than rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1.
在一项随机、评估者盲法研究中,我们比较了60例患者使用瑞帕库溴铵和罗库溴铵后的起效和作用消退情况以及气管插管条件。用2.5mg/kg丙泊酚诱导麻醉后,给予1.5mg/kg瑞帕库溴铵(n = 30)或0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵(n = 30)以利于气管插管。麻醉维持采用丙泊酚输注(100μg/kg·min-1)或七氟醚(呼气末浓度1%)加66%氧化亚氮(N2O),每个亚组各15例。使用肌电图(EMG)设备(Datex Relaxograph)进行神经肌肉监测。瑞帕库溴铵和罗库溴铵的滞后时间(分别为平均42(标准差11)秒和44(16)秒)、最大阻滞程度(分别为99(2)%和98(3)%)以及60秒时的插管条件(分别有86%和84%的患者为良好至优秀)相似。瑞帕库溴铵的起效时间短于罗库溴铵(87(20)秒对141(65)秒,P < 0.001),60秒时的阻滞程度更大(69(26)%对50(27)%,P < 0.05)。在丙泊酚麻醉期间,瑞帕库溴铵的25%恢复时间短于罗库溴铵(15.0(3.2)分钟对39.1(14.2)分钟,P < 0.001);在七氟醚麻醉期间也是如此(15.1(4.2)分钟对47.8(19.0)分钟,P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,1.5mg/kg瑞帕库溴铵比0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵起效更快、插管条件相似且恢复时间更短。