El-Orbany Mohammad I, Wafai Yaser, Joseph Ninos J, Salem M Ramez
Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60657, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Mar;14(2):115-20. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00365-8.
To compare intubation conditions and hemodynamic effects resulting from rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane-rapacuronium and propofol-rapacuronium.
Randomized, blinded study.
Operating suites of a large university-affiliated medical center.
40 ASA physical status I and II adult patients without airway abnormalities who were scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.
Patients were randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane inhalational induction (Group 1) or propofol (2 mg/kg) intravenous induction (Group 2). Group 1 patients were coached on how to perform vital capacity breathing and the anesthesia machine was primed with sevoflurane 8%, N2O:O2 3.5:1.5 L/min. In both groups, when loss of consciousness was established, rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg was administered. After 50 seconds, an anesthesiologist blinded to the study entered the room and attempted laryngoscopy and intubation.
Intubation conditions were graded as excellent, good, poor, or impossible according to Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) criteria. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate changes accompanying both induction techniques were also monitored and recorded.
All patients were successfully intubated within 60 seconds. Clinically acceptable intubating conditions (excellent or good scores) were obtained in 19 of 20 Group 1 patients and in 19 of 20 Group 2 patients. Moderate tachycardia was encountered in both groups and mild systolic hypotension in the Group 2 patients. There were no complications.
Modified rapid-sequence inhalational induction using sevoflurane and rapacuronium produced clinically acceptable intubation conditions within 60 seconds of muscle relaxant administration. The intubation conditions were similar to those produced after intravenous propofol and rapacuronium.
比较七氟醚 - 瑞帕库溴铵和丙泊酚 - 瑞帕库溴铵快速顺序诱导麻醉后的插管条件和血流动力学效应。
随机、双盲研究。
一所大型大学附属医院的手术室。
40例ASA身体状况为I级和II级、无气道异常、计划行需要气管插管的择期手术的成年患者。
患者被随机分配接受七氟醚吸入诱导(第1组)或丙泊酚(2mg/kg)静脉诱导(第2组)。第1组患者接受如何进行肺活量呼吸的指导,麻醉机用8%的七氟醚、N2O:O2 3.5:1.5L/min预充。两组中,在确定意识消失后,给予1.5mg/kg瑞帕库溴铵。50秒后,一名对研究不知情的麻醉医生进入房间,尝试进行喉镜检查和插管。
根据良好临床研究规范(GCRP)标准,将插管条件分为优、良、差或无法插管。同时监测并记录两种诱导技术伴随的动脉血压和心率变化。
所有患者均在60秒内成功插管。第1组20例患者中有19例、第2组20例患者中有19例获得了临床上可接受的插管条件(优或良评分)。两组均出现中度心动过速,第2组患者出现轻度收缩期低血压。无并发症发生。
使用七氟醚和瑞帕库溴铵的改良快速顺序吸入诱导在给予肌肉松弛剂后60秒内产生了临床上可接受的插管条件。插管条件与静脉注射丙泊酚和瑞帕库溴铵后产生的条件相似。