Xing J, Heeger D J
Department of Psychology, Jordan Hall, Bldg. 420, Stanford University, 94305-2130, Stanford, CA, USA.
Vision Res. 2000;40(22):3065-72. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00152-8.
The perceived contrast of a central stimulus can be decreased (surround suppression) or increased (surround facilitation) by the presence of surround stimuli. In this report we examined center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision using contrast-matching tasks. We found that: (1) surround suppression became markedly stronger as the center-surround stimulus was moved toward the periphery; (2) surround facilitation diminished in the periphery; and (3) the suppression in the periphery was less orientation- and frequency-specific than that in the fovea, so that significant suppression was induced even when the central and surround gratings had very different orientations and spatial frequencies. The different center-surround interactions in the fovea and periphery can not be accounted for by cortical magnification, suggesting that center-surround interactions in the fovea and periphery are incommensurable and play different functional roles in human image processing.
中央刺激的感知对比度可因周围刺激的存在而降低(周围抑制)或增加(周围易化)。在本报告中,我们使用对比度匹配任务研究了中央-周围在中央凹和周边视觉中的相互作用。我们发现:(1)随着中央-周围刺激向周边移动,周围抑制显著增强;(2)周围易化在周边减弱;(3)周边的抑制比中央凹的抑制对方向和频率的特异性更低,因此即使中央和周围光栅具有非常不同的方向和空间频率,也会诱导出显著的抑制。中央凹和周边不同的中央-周围相互作用不能用皮质放大来解释,这表明中央凹和周边的中央-周围相互作用是不可通约的,并且在人类图像处理中发挥不同的功能作用。