Suppr超能文献

[Diagnosis and follow-up of arterial hypertension: is the role of nursing staff relevant?].

作者信息

Dalfó Baqué A, Gibert Llorach E, Vila Coll M A, Sabartés Saperas T

机构信息

Grupo de Trabajo en Hipertensión Arterial Gòtic, Equipo de Atención Primaria Gòtic, ICS, Barcelona.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2000 Jul-Aug;26(3):180-3. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78638-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the protagonism of the medical and nursing staff in the diagnosis and observation of hypertense patients in a primary care team.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive study.

SETTING

Urban primary care team.

PARTICIPANTS

Two random samples, with 325 clinical histories, of the hypertense patients under observation in the centre in the years 1995 (N = 1992) and 1996 (N = 1994).

MEASUREMENTS

The following variables were gathered on which professional had conducted the following: the blood pressure triple take (BPTT), physical examination (weight, height and peripheral pulses), request for further tests, health education on factors of cardiovascular risk (FCR), changes in life-style, anamnesis on side-effects in patients under medical treatment, and the number of attendances. The following details of patients were recorded: age and sex, body mass index, known time of hypertension evolution, blood pressure figures at the start and finish of the periods.

MAIN RESULTS

33 people in 1995 (10.2%; 95% CI, 6.8-13.4) and 8 people in 1996 (2.4%; 95% CI, 1-4.8) were diagnosed with hypertension. Average visits per professional in each year was 2.8 and 2.9 for nursing, and 1.5 and 1.8 for the doctor. There was a record of BPTT in 75.6% of cases, analysis request, ECG and full physical examination in 50.5% of cases, tackling CRF in 56.9%, recommendations on changes in life-style in 85.2%, and anamnesis on side-effects in 26.1%. It was basically nursing personnel who conducted BPTT (79.8% in 1996). 1995 saw greater CRF intervention by nursing staff (49.4%; 95% CI, 42.8-56.3) than by medical staff (15.3%; 95% CI, 10.3-19.9). In the second year the figures became 57.5% (95% CI, 50.9-64.2) against 12.3% (95% CI, 7.8-16.7). The interventions on life-style changes and anamnesis on possible side-effects were mainly conducted by nursing staff, at 66.2% (95% CI, 60.2-72.3) against doctors at 25.7% (95% CI, 20.2-31.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The role of nursing staff is fundamental to the diagnosis and observance of hypertense patients in the primary care team.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验