Trials: the next 50 years. Large scale randomised evidence of moderate benefits.
作者信息
Peto R, Baigent C
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1170-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1170.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Trials: the next 50 years. Large scale randomised evidence of moderate benefits.试验：未来50年。适度益处的大规模随机证据。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1170-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1170.
2
Randomised controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine: past achievements, future challenges.心血管医学中的随机对照试验：过去的成就与未来的挑战。
BMJ. 1999 Aug 28;319(7209):564-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7209.564.
3
Patients' preferences and randomised trials.患者偏好与随机试验。
Lancet. 1996 Jan 20;347(8995):171-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90347-5.
4
Meta-analysis of randomized trials: looking back and looking ahead.
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Dec;18(6):594-601; discussion 661-6. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00052-4.
5
Increasing the Impact of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.增强随机对照试验在胃肠内镜检查中的影响力。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):521-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.022. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
Forensic trials inform the present and future.法医审判为现在和未来提供信息。
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;177:182. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.2.182-a.
7
Imaging, radiation oncology and randomised trials: time for a change?
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011 Feb;55(1):97-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02235.x.
8
Do that to me one more time! What kind of trial replications do we need?再对我那样做一次！我们需要什么样的试验重复？
Complement Ther Med. 2008 Aug;16(4):181-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
9
The need for large-scale randomized evidence.对大规模随机证据的需求。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Apr;43(4):349-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00569.x.
10
Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses?从随机对照试验中获取数据：进行可靠且信息丰富的荟萃分析需要多少数据？
BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):1007-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.1007.
引用本文的文献
1
The iSEARCH randomised controlled trial protocol: a pragmatic Australian phase III clinical trial of intrapartum sildenafil citrate to improve outcomes potentially related to intrapartum hypoxia.iSEARCH 随机对照试验方案：一项实用的澳大利亚三期临床研究，评估产时西地那非治疗对产时缺氧相关结局的潜在改善作用。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 28;14(9):e082943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082943.
2
Review of Clinical Equipoise: Examples from Oncology Trials.临床均衡性评价：肿瘤学试验实例。
Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2023;18(1):22-30. doi: 10.2174/2772432817666211221164101.
3
Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records - room for improvement.试验报告的透明度和完整性：第 4 篇论文——使用常规电子记录进行的随机对照试验报告——有改进的空间。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
4
Making trials part of good clinical care: lessons from the RECOVERY trial.将试验纳入优质临床护理：RECOVERY试验的经验教训。
Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e243-e250. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0083.
5
Using Mendelian Randomization to Improve the Design of Randomized Trials.应用孟德尔随机化改进随机临床试验设计。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021 Jul 1;11(7):a040980. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040980.
6
The world is waiting, use sequential analysis and get us the evidence-based treatment we need for COVID-19.全世界都在翘首以盼，我们需要采用序贯分析为 COVID-19 提供基于证据的治疗方法。
Libyan J Med. 2020 Dec;15(1):1770518. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2020.1770518.
7
The clinical effectiveness of sertraline in primary care and the role of depression severity and duration (PANDA): a pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.舍曲林在初级保健中的临床疗效以及抑郁严重程度和病程的作用（PANDA）：一项实用、双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):903-914. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30366-9. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
8
Trial management: we need a cadre of high-class triallists to deliver the answers that patients need.试验管理：我们需要一批高素质的临床试验人员来提供患者所需的答案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 13;20(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3451-z.
9
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the 'Care for Stroke' intervention in India: a smartphone-enabled, carer-supported, educational intervention for management of disabilities following stroke.一项评价印度“关爱中风”干预措施有效性的随机对照试验方案：一种使用智能手机、由护理人员支持的、针对中风后残疾管理的教育干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 9;8(5):e020098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020098.
10
Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.近期关于比较效果研究调查的争议：挑战、机遇与陷阱。
Semin Perinatol. 2016 Oct;40(6):341-347. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Ovarian ablation in breast cancer, 1896 to 1998: milestones along hierarchy of evidence from case report to Cochrane review.1896年至1998年乳腺癌的卵巢切除术：从病例报告到Cochrane系统评价的证据等级里程碑
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1246-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1246.
2
Controlled trials: the 1948 watershed.对照试验：1948年的分水岭事件。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1217-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1217.
3
4
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者并用或两者均不用的随机试验：ISIS-2。ISIS-2（第二次心肌梗死存活国际研究）协作组
Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349-60.
Zotero 插件