Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle.
作者信息
Sackett D L
机构信息
Trout Research & Education Centre at Irish Lake, Markdale, Ont.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2000 May 2;162(9):1311-4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: a new series is launched.随机对照试验为何失败却又不必失败：新系列推出。
CMAJ. 2000 May 2;162(9):1301-2.
3
Why Sackett's analysis of randomized controlled trials fails, but needn't.为什么萨克特对随机对照试验的分析失败了，但其实不必如此。
CMAJ. 2000 Oct 3;163(7):834-5.
4
Designing studies of computer-based alerts and reminders.设计基于计算机的警报和提醒研究。
MD Comput. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):122-6.
5
[Proposed design for a randomized effectiveness study in social medicine].[社会医学随机有效性研究的拟议设计]
Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Aug-Sep;60(8-9):482-5.
6
[Is mental health services research in need of randomised controlled trials?].[心理健康服务研究是否需要随机对照试验？]
Psychiatr Prax. 2005 Nov;32(8):375-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866911.
7
Sources of bias in clinical trials.临床试验中的偏倚来源。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):595-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.013.
8
[The problem of randomization in psychotherapy studies].
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1999 Feb;49(2):68-70.
9
The number, content, and quality of randomized controlled trials in the prevention and care of injuries.预防和护理损伤方面随机对照试验的数量、内容和质量。
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1488-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181568cfc.
10
Randomised controlled trials in Irish general practice.爱尔兰全科医疗中的随机对照试验。
Ir Med J. 2004 Jul-Aug;97(7):215-6.
引用本文的文献
1
The effect of the APOE4 genotype on physiological and cognitive health in randomised controlled trials with an exercise intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在有运动干预的随机对照试验中，APOE4基因型对生理和认知健康的影响：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trials. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08696-4.
2
Declaration of Helsinki: ethical norm in pursuit of common global goals.《赫尔辛基宣言》：追求全球共同目标中的伦理规范。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 2;11:1360653. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360653. eCollection 2024.
3
Principles of designing a clinical trial: optimizing chances of trial success.设计临床试验的原则：优化试验成功的几率。
Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2018 Jun;5(2):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s40473-018-0152-y. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.近期关于比较效果研究调查的争议：挑战、机遇与陷阱。
Semin Perinatol. 2016 Oct;40(6):341-347. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Clinical trials in crisis: Four simple methodologic fixes.临床试验面临危机：四种简单的方法学改进措施。
Clin Trials. 2014 Dec;11(6):615-21. doi: 10.1177/1740774514553681. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
6
The ethics of clinical trials.临床试验的伦理规范
Ecancermedicalscience. 2014 Jan 16;8:387. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2014.387. eCollection 2014.
7
Assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in the field of dentistry indexed in the Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde) database.评估Lilacs（拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学文献）数据库中索引的牙科领域随机对照试验的偏倚风险。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2011 Mar;129(2):85-93. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000200006.
8
Validity of Qualis database as a predictor of evidence hierarchy and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials: a case study in dentistry.Qualis 数据库作为随机对照试验证据层级和偏倚风险预测指标的有效性：牙科学案例研究。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(2):337-42. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200025.
9
Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials.运用商业模式方法和市场推广技术来招募临床试验参与者。
Trials. 2011 Mar 11;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-74.
10
Plea of the defence-critical comments on the interpretation of EVA3S, SPACE and ICSS.辩护方对 EVA3S、SPACE 和 ICSS 解释的关键意见。
Neuroradiology. 2010 Jul;52(7):601-10. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0707-4. Epub 2010 May 4.
本文引用的文献
1
Trials: the next 50 years. Large scale randomised evidence of moderate benefits.试验：未来50年。适度益处的大规模随机证据。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1170-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1170.
2
Equipoise and the ethics of randomization.equipoise与随机化的伦理问题。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Oct;88(10):552-9.
3
Subverting randomization in controlled trials.在对照试验中破坏随机化
JAMA. 1995 Nov 8;274(18):1456-8.
4
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research.equipoise与临床研究伦理
N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304.
5
Equipoise and the ethics of segmental liver transplantation.
Clin Res. 1988 Oct;36(6):539-45.
6
Of mice but not men. Problems of the randomized clinical trial.只适用于小鼠而非人类。随机临床试验的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1991 May 30;324(22):1585-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105303242208.
Zotero 插件