Beaucournu J C
Laboratoire de parasitologie et zoologie appliquée, Faculté de médecine, Rennes, France.
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999 Dec;92(5 Pt 2):419-21.
The Indian model of plague transmission by Xenopsylla cheopis, discovered by P.L. Simond, has been largely adopted even though it is flawed. X. cheopis cannot be the primitive vector, for neither its nor the rats' cradle is the same as for plague. Furthermore, the insect's vital cycle is impaired by proventriculus blocking. The combination of three factors--the synathropic rat, X. cheopis and Yersinia pestis--coupled with man's seafaring was what led to the multiplication of plague foci. This in turn "created" the third pandemic only because the disease was thus spread to very diverse biogeographical zones. The perennial establishment of the cycle happened through the bacillus' adaptation to many endemic fleas and parasites of numerous endemic animals. Indeed, in many countries, X cheopis is not involved in the persistence of selvatic plague.
由P.L. 西蒙德发现的印度通过印鼠客蚤传播鼠疫的模式,尽管存在缺陷,但已被广泛采用。印鼠客蚤不可能是原始媒介,因为它和老鼠的生态位都与鼠疫不同。此外,昆虫的生命周期因前胃阻塞而受损。共生鼠、印鼠客蚤和鼠疫耶尔森菌这三个因素,再加上人类的航海活动,导致了鼠疫疫源地的增加。这反过来又“引发”了第三次鼠疫大流行,仅仅是因为这种疾病因此传播到了非常不同的生物地理区域。这个循环的长期存在是通过杆菌对许多地方动物的地方跳蚤和寄生虫的适应而发生的。事实上,在许多国家,印鼠客蚤并不参与野生鼠疫的持续传播。