使用国家统计局社会经济分类法分析死亡率中的社会阶层差异——太少，太早：对钱多拉的回应
Social class differences in mortality using the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification--too little, too soon: a reply to Chandola.
作者信息
Rose D, Pevalin D J
机构信息
Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, UK.
出版信息
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(7):1121-7; discussion 1129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00136-2.
Chandola's (2000; Social Science and Medicine, 50(5), 641-649) claims that the UK National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) is not significantly related to mortality are examined. It is shown that this result is likely to be an artefact of the data and methods he uses. Other findings and interpretations in his paper are also critically discussed. In the process, various theoretical, measurement and analysis issues relating to the use of classifications such as the NS-SEC in health research are reviewed.
钱多拉（2000年；《社会科学与医学》，第50卷第5期，641 - 649页）声称英国国家统计局社会经济分类（NS - SEC）与死亡率没有显著关联，本文对此进行了检验。结果表明，这一结果可能是他所使用的数据和方法造成的假象。他论文中的其他发现和解释也受到了批判性讨论。在此过程中，还回顾了与健康研究中使用NS - SEC等分类相关的各种理论、测量和分析问题。
Zotero 插件