• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Addiction as a market failure: using rational addiction results to justify tobacco regulation.

作者信息

Laux F L

机构信息

Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), School of Business, México, D.F., Mexico.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2000 Jul;19(4):421-37. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00040-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00040-5
PMID:11010233
Abstract

Tobacco regulation efforts have been criticized by some academic economists for failing to provide adequate welfare-analytic justification. This paper attempts to address these criticisms. Unlike previous research that has discussed second-hand smoke and health care financing externalities, this paper develops the logic for identifying the much larger market failures attributable to the failure of smokers to fully internalize the costs of their addictive behavior. The focus is on teen addiction as a form of "intrapersonal" externality and observed adult consumption behavior consistent with partial myopia. The importance of peer effects, in the consideration of welfare impacts, is also emphasized.

摘要

相似文献

1
Addiction as a market failure: using rational addiction results to justify tobacco regulation.
J Health Econ. 2000 Jul;19(4):421-37. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00040-5.
2
The economics of tobacco regulation.烟草管制的经济学
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):146-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.146.
3
Cost-benefit analysis involving addictive goods: contingent valuation to estimate willingness-to-pay for smoking cessation.涉及成瘾性商品的成本效益分析:用条件价值法估计戒烟的支付意愿。
Health Econ. 2009 Feb;18(2):181-202. doi: 10.1002/hec.1365.
4
Does cigarette price influence adolescent experimentation?香烟价格会影响青少年尝试吸烟吗?
J Health Econ. 2001 Mar;20(2):261-70. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00081-3.
5
Anxious adults vs. cool children: children's views on smoking and addiction.
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Sep;53(5):593-602. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00367-1.
6
An economic theory of cigarette addiction.一种关于香烟成瘾的经济理论。
J Health Econ. 1999 Jan;18(1):1-29. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00037-x.
7
Systematic review of social network analysis in adolescent cigarette smoking behavior.系统综述青少年吸烟行为中的社会网络分析。
J Sch Health. 2012 Jan;82(1):21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00663.x.
8
Characteristics of smoker support for increasing a dedicated tobacco tax: national survey data from New Zealand.支持提高专用烟草税的吸烟者特征:来自新西兰的全国调查数据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Feb;12(2):168-73. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp178. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
9
Smoke and mirrors: Florida's tobacco-related Medicaid costs may turn out to be a mirage.障眼法:佛罗里达州与烟草相关的医疗补助成本可能到头来只是幻影。
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 1998 Mar(228):9-38.
10
A balanced tobacco control policy.一项平衡的烟草控制政策。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Mar;93(3):416-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.3.416.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco Regulation and Cost-Benefit Analysis: How Should We Value Foregone Consumer Surplus?烟草管制与成本效益分析:我们应如何评估放弃的消费者剩余价值?
Am J Health Econ. 2018 Winter;4(1):1-25. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00091. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
An evaluation of the FDA's analysis of the costs and benefits of the graphic warning label regulation.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于图形警示标签规定的成本效益分析的评估。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(2):112-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052022. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
3
When health policy and empirical evidence collide: the case of cigarette package warning labels and economic consumer surplus.
当卫生政策与实证证据冲突时:以香烟包装警示标签和经济消费者剩余为例。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e42-51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301737. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
Are smokers rational addicts? Empirical evidence from the Indonesian Family Life Survey.吸烟者是理性的瘾君子吗?来自印度尼西亚家庭生活调查的经验证据。
Harm Reduct J. 2011 Feb 23;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-8-6.
5
Optimal commodity taxation with moral hazard and unobservable outcomes.存在道德风险和不可观测结果时的最优商品税
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Mar;3(1):53-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1023272032586.