Spencer J, Blackmore D, Heard S, McCrorie P, McHaffie D, Scherpbier A, Gupta T S, Singh K, Southgate L
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, New Castle upon Tyne, UK.
Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):851-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00779.x.
To explore the contribution patients can make to medical education from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, to describe a framework for reviewing and monitoring patient involvement in specific educational situations and to generate suggestions for further research.
Literature review.
Direct contact with patients can be seen to play a crucial role in the development of clinical reasoning, communication skills, professional attitudes and empathy. It also motivates through promoting relevance and providing context. Few studies have explored this area, including effects on the patients themselves, although there are examples of good practice in promoting more active participation.
The Cambridge framework is a tool for evaluating the involvement of patients in the educational process, which could be used by curriculum planners and teachers to review and monitor the extent to which patients are actively involved. Areas for further research include looking at the 'added value' of using real, as opposed to simulated, patients; more work on outcomes for patients (other than satisfaction); the role of real patients in assessment; and the strengths and weaknesses of different models of patient involvement.
从理论和实证角度探讨患者对医学教育的贡献,描述一个用于审视和监测患者在特定教育情境中参与情况的框架,并提出进一步研究的建议。
文献综述。
与患者的直接接触在临床推理、沟通技巧、专业态度和同理心的培养中起着关键作用。它还通过提升相关性和提供背景来激发动力。尽管有促进更积极参与的良好实践案例,但很少有研究探讨这一领域,包括对患者自身的影响。
剑桥框架是评估患者在教育过程中参与情况的工具,课程规划者和教师可利用它来审视和监测患者积极参与的程度。进一步研究的领域包括研究使用真实患者(而非模拟患者)的“附加值”;针对患者结局(而非满意度)开展更多工作;真实患者在评估中的作用;以及不同患者参与模式的优缺点。