Suppr超能文献

[加速滴定设计]

[Accelerated titration design].

作者信息

Minami H

机构信息

National Cancer Center Hospital East.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Sep;27(10):1601-7.

Abstract

To reduce the number of patients treated at low and biologically inactive doses in phase I trials of anticancer agents, attempts to decrease the number of patients per dose level and to conduct a larger dose escalation have been made. Among them, accelerated titration designs were proposed and evaluated by simulation; designs 2 and 4 were reported to be acceptable (J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 1138-1147, 1997). Both designs 2 and 4 included only one patient per cohort during the initial accelerated phase. Dosage steps for the accelerated phase were defined using the modified Fibonacci method for design 2 and 100% escalation for design 4, respectively. The accelerated phase continued until one patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity or two patients experienced grade 2 toxicities. Dose escalation was conducted based on the information from the first course in design 2 and from the first three courses in design 4. In the simulation, both designs successfully reduced the total number of patients and the number of undertreated patients without increasing the number of overtreated patients. However, the safety of design 4 was assured as long as all patients received three courses of chemotherapy, which is unusual in phase I studies in Japan. Decision-making on dose escalation based on the information on toxicity in three courses might be cumbersome. Therefore, in Japan, design 2 would be recommended among the proposed accelerated designs. The performance of the design should be investigated by applying it to actual phase I studies and by evaluating the number of undertreated and overtreated patients.

摘要

为了减少抗癌药物I期试验中接受低剂量和生物学无活性剂量治疗的患者数量,人们尝试减少每个剂量水平的患者数量,并进行更大幅度的剂量递增。其中,加速滴定设计被提出并通过模拟进行评估;据报道,设计2和设计4是可接受的(《美国国家癌症研究所杂志》89: 1138 - 1147, 1997)。设计2和设计4在初始加速阶段每个队列仅包含一名患者。加速阶段的剂量步长分别使用改良斐波那契方法为设计2定义,以及为设计4定义为100%递增。加速阶段持续到有一名患者出现剂量限制性毒性或两名患者出现2级毒性。在设计2中,根据第一个疗程的信息进行剂量递增;在设计4中,根据前三个疗程的信息进行剂量递增。在模拟中,两种设计都成功减少了患者总数和治疗不足的患者数量,而没有增加治疗过度的患者数量。然而,设计4的安全性只有在所有患者都接受三个疗程化疗的情况下才能得到保证,这在日本的I期研究中并不常见。基于三个疗程毒性信息进行剂量递增的决策可能很繁琐。因此,在日本,在所提出的加速设计中,推荐设计2。应通过将其应用于实际的I期研究,并评估治疗不足和治疗过度的患者数量,来研究该设计的性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验