Hunsberger Sally, Rubinstein Lawrence V, Dancey Janet, Korn Edward L
Biometrics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stat Med. 2005 Jul 30;24(14):2171-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.2102.
Traditional phase I dose-finding studies for chemotoxic agents base dose escalation on toxicity, with escalation continuing until unacceptable toxicity is observed. Recent development of molecularly targeted agents that have little or no toxicity in the therapeutic dose range has raised questions over the best study designs for phase I studies. Two types of designs are proposed and evaluated in this paper. In these designs, escalation is based on a binary response that indicates whether or not the agent has had the desired effect on the molecular target. One design is developed to ensure that if the true target response rate is low there will be a high probability of escalating and if the true target response rate is high there will be a low probability of escalating. The other design is developed to continue to escalate as long as the true response rate is increasing and to stop escalating when the response rate plateaus or decreases. A limited simulation study is performed and the designs are compared with respect to the dose level at the end of escalation and the number of patients treated on study.
传统的化学毒性药物I期剂量探索研究基于毒性进行剂量递增,递增会持续到观察到不可接受的毒性。近期开发的分子靶向药物在治疗剂量范围内几乎没有毒性,这引发了关于I期研究最佳设计的问题。本文提出并评估了两种类型的设计。在这些设计中,递增基于一个二元反应,该反应表明药物是否对分子靶点产生了预期效果。一种设计旨在确保如果真实的靶点反应率较低,递增的概率会很高;如果真实的靶点反应率较高,递增的概率会很低。另一种设计旨在只要真实反应率在增加就继续递增,当反应率趋于平稳或下降时停止递增。进行了一项有限的模拟研究,并就递增结束时的剂量水平和研究中治疗的患者数量对这些设计进行了比较。