Suppr超能文献

轴II结构的跨文化普遍性:对中华人民共和国两种人格障碍评估工具的评价。

The cross-cultural generalizability of Axis-II constructs: an evaluation of two personality disorder assessment instruments in the People's Republic of China.

作者信息

Yang J, McCrae R R, Costa P T, Yao S, Dai X, Cai T, Gao B

机构信息

Personality, Stress, and Coping Section, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2000 Fall;14(3):249-63. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.249.

Abstract

We examined the reliability, cross-instrument validity, and factor structure of Chinese adaptations of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4+; N = 1,926) and Personality Disorders Interview (PDI-IV; N = 525) in psychiatric patients. Comparisons with data from Western countries suggest that the psychometric properties of these two instruments are comparable across cultures. Low to modest agreement between the PDQ-4+ and PDI-IV was observed for both dimensional and categorical personality disorder evaluations. When the PDI-IV was used as the diagnostic standard, the PDQ-4+ showed higher sensitivity than specificity, and higher negative predictive power than positive predictive power. Factor analyses of both instruments replicated the four-factor structure O'Connor and Dyce (1998) found in Western samples. Results suggested that conceptions and measures of DSM-IV personality disorders are cross-culturally generalizable to Chinese psychiatric populations.

摘要

我们检验了人格诊断问卷(PDQ - 4+;N = 1926)和人格障碍访谈(PDI - IV;N = 525)的中文版在精神科患者中的信度、跨工具效度及因子结构。与西方国家数据的比较表明,这两种工具的心理测量特性在不同文化间具有可比性。在维度和类别性人格障碍评估中,PDQ - 4+与PDI - IV之间的一致性较低到中等。以PDI - IV作为诊断标准时,PDQ - 4+表现出的敏感性高于特异性,阴性预测力高于阳性预测力。两种工具的因子分析都重现了奥康纳和戴斯(1998)在西方样本中发现的四因子结构。结果表明,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)人格障碍的概念和测量方法在跨文化情境下可推广至中国精神科人群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验