Suppr超能文献

白人、非裔美国、西班牙裔和亚裔儿童在纳格利里非言语能力测验上的比较。

Comparison of white, African American, Hispanic, and Asian children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test.

作者信息

Naglieri J A, Ronning M E

机构信息

School Psychology, Ohio State University, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2000 Sep;12(3):328-34. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.328.

Abstract

This study examined differences between 3 matched samples of White (n = 2,306) and African American (n = 2,306), White (n = 1,176) and Hispanic (n = 1,176), and White (n = 466) and Asian (n = 466) children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT; J. A. Naglieri, 1997a). The groups were selected from 22,620 children included in the NNAT standardization sample and matched on geographic region, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and type of school setting (public or private). There was only a small difference between the NNAT scores for the White and African American samples (d ratio = .25) and minimal differences between the White and Hispanic (d ratio = .17) and between the White and Asian (d ratio = .02) groups. The NNAT was moderately correlated with achievement for the total sample and correlated similarly with achievement for the White and ethnic minority groups. The median correlation of NNAT with reading was .52 and NNAT with math was .63 across the samples. Results suggest that the NNAT scores have use for fair assessment of White and minority children.

摘要

本研究考察了在纳格利里非言语能力测验(NNAT;J.A.纳格利里,1997a)上,三组匹配样本的儿童之间的差异,这三组样本分别是白人儿童(n = 2306)与非裔美国儿童(n = 2306)、白人儿童(n = 1176)与西班牙裔儿童(n = 1176)、白人儿童(n = 466)与亚裔儿童(n = 466)。这些组是从NNAT标准化样本中的22620名儿童中选取的,并在地理区域、社会经济地位、种族和学校类型(公立或私立)方面进行了匹配。白人样本和非裔美国样本的NNAT分数之间只有很小的差异(效应量d = 0.25),白人样本和西班牙裔样本之间(效应量d = 0.17)以及白人样本和亚裔样本之间(效应量d = 0.02)的差异极小。NNAT与整个样本的学业成绩呈中等程度的相关,与白人组和少数族裔组的学业成绩的相关性类似。在所有样本中,NNAT与阅读的中位数相关系数为0.52,与数学的中位数相关系数为0.63。结果表明,NNAT分数可用于对白人儿童和少数族裔儿童进行公平评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验