• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《智力的PASS理论及其使用认知评估系统的测量(第二版)》

PASS Theory of Intelligence and Its Measurement Using the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition.

作者信息

Naglieri Jack A, Otero Tulio M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

Department of Psychology, California Southern University, Chandler, AZ 85286, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):77. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080077.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12080077
PMID:39195124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355437/
Abstract

The goal of this paper was to describe the context within which the PASS theory of intelligence was conceived and the reasons why this theory was used to guide the construction of the Cognitive Assessment System and the several versions of the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition. We also discuss validity issues such as equitable assessment of intelligence, using PASS scores to examine a pattern of strengths and weaknesses related to academic variability and diagnosis, and the utility of PASS scores for intervention. We provide summaries of the research that informs our suggestions that intelligence testing should be theory-based, not constrained by the seminal work of test developers in the early 1900s, and neurocognitive processes should be measured based on brain function.

摘要

本文的目的是描述智力的PASS理论形成的背景,以及该理论被用于指导认知评估系统构建的原因,还有认知评估系统第二版的几个版本。我们还讨论了效度问题,如智力的公平评估、使用PASS分数来检查与学业差异和诊断相关的优势与劣势模式,以及PASS分数在干预方面的效用。我们总结了相关研究,这些研究为我们的建议提供了依据,即智力测试应基于理论,不受20世纪初测试开发者开创性工作的限制,并且神经认知过程应基于脑功能进行测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/cf6ec0d99c18/jintelligence-12-00077-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/05f246811454/jintelligence-12-00077-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/5ca32ab623f8/jintelligence-12-00077-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/cf6ec0d99c18/jintelligence-12-00077-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/05f246811454/jintelligence-12-00077-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/5ca32ab623f8/jintelligence-12-00077-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6f/11355437/cf6ec0d99c18/jintelligence-12-00077-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
PASS Theory of Intelligence and Its Measurement Using the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition.《智力的PASS理论及其使用认知评估系统的测量(第二版)》
J Intell. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):77. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080077.
2
Applying the Discrepancy Consistency Method on CAS-2: Brief Data in a Sample of Greek-Speaking Children.在CAS-2上应用差异一致性方法:希腊语儿童样本中的简要数据
J Intell. 2024 Apr 5;12(4):43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040043.
3
Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis of U.S. and Italian children's performance on the PASS theory of intelligence as measured by the Cognitive Assessment System.采用认知评估系统对美国和意大利儿童进行 PASS 理论智力测试的表现进行多群组验证性因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):157-66. doi: 10.1037/a0029828. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
4
Utility of the PASS theory and cognitive assessment system for Dutch children with and without ADHD.PASS理论和认知评估系统对荷兰患和未患注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的效用。
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;38(5):434-9. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380050601.
5
Do the Kaufman tests of cognitive ability and academic achievement display construct bias across a representative sample of Black, Hispanic, and Caucasian school-age children in grades 1 through 12?考夫曼认知能力和学业成绩测试在1至12年级具有代表性的黑人、西班牙裔和白种学龄儿童样本中是否存在结构偏差?
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):942-52. doi: 10.1037/pas0000236. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Dual discrepancy/consistency pattern of strengths and weaknesses method of specific learning disability identification: Classification accuracy when combining clinical judgment with assessment data.双重不相符/一致模式的优势和弱势方法在特定学习障碍识别中的应用:将临床判断与评估数据相结合时的分类准确性。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.现代智力评估必须公平公正。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):126. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126.
9
The neurocognitive assessment of Hispanic English-language learners with reading failure.对有阅读障碍的西班牙裔英语学习者的神经认知评估。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2013;2(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2012.670547. Epub 2012 May 1.
10
A Misuse of IQ Scores: Using the Dual Discrepancy/Consistency Model for Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities.智商分数的误用:运用双重差异/一致性模型识别特定学习障碍
J Intell. 2018 Aug 1;6(3):36. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030036.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction to Special Issue "Neurocognitive Processes: Measurement, Connections to Academic Achievement and Clinical Applications".特刊《神经认知过程:测量、与学业成就的关联及临床应用》引言
J Intell. 2025 Aug 4;13(8):97. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13080097.
2
Clustering Analysis of Cognitive Profiles of Clinical Groups Using the CAS: An Examination of Japanese Clinical Populations.使用儿童认知评估量表(CAS)对临床群体认知特征进行聚类分析:对日本临床人群的考察
J Intell. 2025 Jun 19;13(6):71. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060071.
3
PASS Theory and Movement Disorders: Methodology for Assessment and Intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing Black-White Racial Differences on Intelligence Tests Used in Hiring for Public Safety Jobs.减少公共安全工作招聘中使用的智力测试中的黑白种族差异。
J Intell. 2023 Mar 28;11(4):62. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040062.
2
Intelligence Process vs. Content and Academic Performance: A Trip through a House of Mirrors.智力过程与内容及学业成绩:一场穿越镜子屋的旅程
J Intell. 2022 Dec 19;10(4):128. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040128.
3
Dynamic expression of brain functional systems disclosed by fine-scale analysis of edge time series.
PASS理论与运动障碍:评估与干预方法
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;11(10):1192. doi: 10.3390/children11101192.
4
Strategies Used by Puerto Rican Children in the Cognitive Assessment System and Their Relationship with Planning Performance.波多黎各儿童在认知评估系统中使用的策略及其与计划能力的关系。
J Intell. 2024 Sep 21;12(9):90. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12090090.
通过边缘时间序列的精细尺度分析揭示脑功能系统的动态表达。
Netw Neurosci. 2021 Apr 27;5(2):405-433. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00182. eCollection 2021.
4
Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey.美国学校心理学家的测试使用和评估实践:2017 年全国调查结果。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Feb;72:29-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
5
A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status.流体智力与阅读/数学关系的元分析:任务、年龄和社会经济地位的影响。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Feb;145(2):189-236. doi: 10.1037/bul0000182.
6
Revisiting Carroll's survey of factor-analytic studies: Implications for the clinical assessment of intelligence.重新审视卡罗尔的因素分析研究调查:对智力临床评估的启示。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Aug;30(8):1028-1038. doi: 10.1037/pas0000556. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
Structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Confirmatory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的结构效度:对16个主要和次要分测验的验证性因素分析
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):458-472. doi: 10.1037/pas0000358. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Exploratory and hierarchical factor analysis of the WJ-IV Cognitive at school age.学龄期WJ-IV认知能力的探索性和分层因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):394-407. doi: 10.1037/pas0000350. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Factor structure of the Differential Ability Scales-Second Edition: Exploratory and hierarchical factor analyses with the core subtests.《差异能力量表第二版》的因素结构:对核心子测验进行探索性和层次因素分析
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1475-1488. doi: 10.1037/pas0000279. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
10
The small-world organization of large-scale brain systems and relationships with subcortical structures.大规模脑系统的小世界组织及其与皮质下结构的关系。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2014;3(4):245-52. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2014.946803.