Manias E, Street A
School of Postgraduate Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria.
Nurs Inq. 2000 Mar;7(1):50-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2000.00048.x.
The benefits and constraints of philosophical frameworks using the work of Michel Foucault and critical social theorists, such as Fay, Giroux and McLaren, are examined in the light of their traditions. The reasons nurse researchers adopt these frameworks are explored, as are the tensions between the respective theories. A complementary 'toolbox' approach to the research process addresses some of the theoretical and methodological challenges presented by each framework. Such an approach provides distinctive insights into nursing practice that the other has ignored or missed. It is argued that by converging the two frameworks into a toolbox approach, it is possible to examine or deconstruct existing practices, whilst also providing an avenue for nurses to reconstruct or change such practices.
结合米歇尔·福柯及费伊、吉鲁克斯和麦克拉伦等批判社会理论家的著作,根据其传统来审视哲学框架的益处与局限性。探讨了护理研究者采用这些框架的原因,以及各理论之间的矛盾之处。对研究过程采用一种互补的“工具箱”方法,可应对每个框架所带来的一些理论和方法挑战。这种方法能提供其他框架所忽略或遗漏的关于护理实践的独特见解。有人认为,通过将这两种框架融合为一种工具箱方法,既能够审视或解构现有实践,同时也为护士重构或改变此类实践提供了一条途径。