Burnett G B, Little S R, Graham N, Forrest A D
Dis Nerv Syst. 1975 Nov;36(11):625-9.
The results are reported of a double-blind controlled trial of a recently introduced major tranquilizer thiothixene (Navane, Pfizer) against chlorpromazine in 24 chronic schizophrenics in the Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland. Additionally, a limited experiment in withdrawal of routine tranquilizers in these patients (one month) was carried out prior to the trial. Changes in manifest psychosis (symptoms) and social disability were assessed by the use of the Lorr scale (IMPS) and the Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE) at suitable intervals. The results indicated that thiothixene conferred no advantage over chlorpromazine in symptom relief or social improvement. Serial measures showed no significant change in these patients as a group when on active drugs as opposed to placebo, or with the course of time. 12.5% of patients relapsed during the placebo period: these patients were younger than the non-relapsers and had received larger daily doses of phenothiazines prior to the trial.
本文报告了在苏格兰爱丁堡皇家医院对24名慢性精神分裂症患者进行的一项双盲对照试验结果,该试验旨在比较一种新推出的主要镇静剂硫利达嗪(Navane,辉瑞公司生产)与氯丙嗪的疗效。此外,在试验前对这些患者进行了为期一个月的常规镇静剂撤药有限实验。在适当的时间间隔,使用洛尔量表(IMPS)和护士住院患者评估观察量表(NOSIE)评估明显精神病症状(症状)和社会残疾的变化。结果表明,在缓解症状或改善社会功能方面,硫利达嗪并不比氯丙嗪更具优势。系列测量显示,与服用安慰剂相比,这些患者在服用活性药物时,作为一个群体,在症状或随着时间推移方面没有显著变化。12.5%的患者在安慰剂期复发:这些患者比未复发患者年轻,且在试验前接受了更大剂量的每日吩噻嗪类药物治疗。