Rösch T, Dittler H J, Strobel K, Meining A, Schusdziarra V, Lorenz R, Allescher H D, Kassem A M, Gerhardt P, Siewert J R, Höfler H, Classen M
Departments of Internal Medicine II, General Surgery, Radiology and Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Oct;52(4):469-77. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.106682.
It has been claimed in several prospective studies that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is highly accurate in the locoregional staging of pancreatic cancer. However, the value of the EUS criteria for the diagnosis of vascular involvement is less well established. To totally exclude potential bias introduced by the availability of prior information, a completely blinded analysis of videotapes of patients with cancer of the pancreatic head was therefore conducted.
Videotape sequences of 75 patients with cancer of the head of the pancreas with surgical confirmation or unequivocally positive angiography demonstrating vascular invasion were reevaluated without any clinical data or information from other imaging studies. Involvement of the vascular system (portal vein with confluence, superior mesenteric vein, celiac axis) was assessed on EUS with special emphasis on EUS parameters of the tumor-vessel relationship.
The overall sensitivity and specificity of EUS in the diagnosis of venous invasion were 43% and 91%, respectively, when using predetermined parameters (visualization of tumor in the lumen, complete obstruction, or collateral vessels). If the parameter "irregular tumor-vessel relationship" had been added to these criteria, the sensitivity would have risen to 62%, but the specificity would have fallen to 79%. The only vascular system that could be properly visualized by EUS was the portal vein/confluence area. The positive and negative predictive values for the single parameters chosen to diagnose portal venous involvement were as follows: 42% and 33% for irregular tumor-vessel relationship, 36% and 34% for visualization of tumor in the vascular lumen, 80% and 28% for complete vascular obstruction, and 88% and 18% for collateral vessels.
In a completely blinded evaluation of the EUS diagnosis of vascular invasion by cancer of the head of the pancreas it was not possible to find suitable morphologic parameters with clinically useful sensitivity and specificity values (over 80%).
多项前瞻性研究称,内镜超声检查(EUS)在胰腺癌的局部区域分期方面具有很高的准确性。然而,EUS诊断血管受累的标准价值尚未得到充分确立。为了完全排除先验信息可用性带来的潜在偏差,因此对胰头癌患者的录像带进行了完全盲法分析。
对75例经手术证实或血管造影明确显示血管侵犯的胰头癌患者的录像带序列进行重新评估,不提供任何临床数据或其他影像学研究信息。通过EUS评估血管系统(门静脉汇合处、肠系膜上静脉、腹腔干)受累情况,特别关注肿瘤与血管关系的EUS参数。
使用预定参数(管腔内肿瘤可视化、完全阻塞或侧支血管)时,EUS诊断静脉侵犯的总体敏感性和特异性分别为43%和91%。如果将“肿瘤与血管关系不规则”这一参数添加到这些标准中,敏感性将升至62%,但特异性将降至79%。EUS能够清晰显示的唯一血管系统是门静脉/汇合区。用于诊断门静脉受累的单个参数的阳性和阴性预测值如下:肿瘤与血管关系不规则为42%和33%,血管腔内肿瘤可视化为36%和34%,血管完全阻塞为80%和28%,侧支血管为88%和18%。
在对EUS诊断胰头癌血管侵犯进行完全盲法评估时,无法找到具有临床有用敏感性和特异性值(超过80%)的合适形态学参数。