• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing abuse among the elderly living in public housing.

作者信息

Moody L E, Voss A, Lengacher C A

机构信息

University of South Florida, College of Nursing, Tampa 33612, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Meas. 2000 Summer;8(1):61-70.

PMID:11026166
Abstract

Abuse and victimization among the elderly have received increased attention in the last few years from practitioners, researchers, and policymakers but remain growing problems, especially for elders who live in public housing. This study assessed the psychometric properties of an existing instrument, the Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test (HSEAST), which has been tested in only two studies. The instrument was administered to 100 African American, Hispanic, and White elders living in public housing. Study results were compared to findings from a previous study of elderly groups. A principal components factor analysis of the 15-item instrument supported the 3-factor structure for a total of 10 items (factor loadings = 0.4 or >), explaining 38% of the variance. A discriminant function analysis showed that 6 items were as effective as the 9-item model in classifying cases (71.4%) as abused.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing abuse among the elderly living in public housing.
J Nurs Meas. 2000 Summer;8(1):61-70.
2
Assessing readiness for death in hospice elders and older adults.评估临终关怀机构中老年人及高龄成年人对死亡的准备情况。
Hosp J. 2000;15(2):49-65.
3
Psychometric properties and cross-cultural equivalence of the Arabic Social Capital Scale: instrument development study.阿拉伯社会资本量表的心理测量特性及跨文化等效性:工具开发研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.07.010. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
Assessing the quality of the dyadic relationship in first-time parents: development of a new instrument.评估初为人父母者的二元关系质量:一种新工具的开发。
J Fam Nurs. 2005 Feb;11(1):19-37. doi: 10.1177/1074840704273462.
5
Geriatric fear of falling measure: development and psychometric testing.老年人跌倒恐惧量表:编制与心理测量学测试
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.04.006. Epub 2005 Jun 15.
6
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
7
[French validation of the revised Piper Fatigue Scale].[修订版派珀疲劳量表的法语验证]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2002 Mar(68):50-65.
8
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Caregiver Reciprocity Scale II.
J Nurs Meas. 2000 Fall-Winter;8(2):179-91.
9
Development and validation of four-item version of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire to assess ejaculatory dysfunction.用于评估射精功能障碍的男性性健康问卷四项版本的开发与验证
Urology. 2007 May;69(5):805-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.036.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷中文版的心理测量学评估。
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):441-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299849.21935.c4.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.社区和机构环境中老年人虐待情况测量工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 29;20(3):e1419. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1419. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Assessment of elder mistreatment in two American Indian samples: psychometric characteristics of the HS-EAST and the Native Elder Life-Financial Exploitation and -Neglect measures.对两个美国印第安人样本中的老年人虐待情况进行评估:HS-EAST量表以及原住民老年人生活-财务剥削与忽视量表的心理测量特征。
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Apr;33(3):336-56. doi: 10.1177/0733464812470748. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
3
Screening for elder mistreatment in a dental clinic population.
在牙科诊所人群中筛查虐待老年人行为。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2012 Oct;24(4):326-39. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2012.661683.