• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干扰素β-1b延缓多发性硬化症残疾进展的成本效益。初步估算。

Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1b in slowing multiple sclerosis disability progression. First estimates.

作者信息

Brown M G, Murray T J, Sketris I S, Fisk J D, LeBlanc J C, Schwartz C E, Skedgel C

机构信息

Dalhousie University.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Summer;16(3):751-67. doi: 10.1017/s026646230010203x.

DOI:10.1017/s026646230010203x
PMID:11028131
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of interferon beta-1b (IFN beta-1b) in slowing disability progression in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

Treatment program costs and health outcomes are modeled for cohorts of 1,000 females and 1,000 males followed 40 years from onset. Fifteen scenarios model MS natural history progression, treatment efficacy, direct treatment costs, and MS healthcare costs. A single randomized placebo-controlled trial of IFN beta-1b found reduced disease activity by MRI, reduced frequency and severity of exacerbations, and a tendency toward slower disability progression. Disability years avoided are modeled as the primary health outcome analyzed. A ministry of health (MOH) perspective is adopted, using Nova Scotia population-based data. Annual IFN beta-1b direct treatment costs (Can $16,685) are high relative to both MOH healthcare costs per person with MS (Can $2,000) and estimated MOH costs avoided.

RESULTS

Given "reference case" assumptions for women with RRMS, treatment reduces lifetime disability years by 10%. Cost per disability year avoided before discounting is Can $189,230 (US $124,892), and Can $274,842 (US $181,395) after discounting at 5%. Estimates for alternative scenarios vary greatly, leaving main findings unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale, cost per disability year avoided due to interferon beta-1b treatment in RRMS is quite high. Comparable CE estimates, using MS-specific or generic health-related quality-of-life outcome measures, are even higher. Further research is required to better measure treatment effects, modification of MS natural history, and net societal costs of IFN beta-1b in RRMS.

摘要

目的

评估β-1b干扰素(IFNβ-1b)在延缓复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者残疾进展方面的成本效益(CE)。

方法

对1000名女性和1000名男性患者从发病起随访40年的队列进行治疗方案成本和健康结果建模。15种情景模拟了MS自然病史进展、治疗效果、直接治疗成本和MS医疗保健成本。一项关于IFNβ-1b的单一随机安慰剂对照试验发现,MRI显示疾病活动减少,病情加重的频率和严重程度降低,且有残疾进展放缓的趋势。避免的残疾年数被建模为分析的主要健康结果。采用基于新斯科舍省人群数据的卫生部(MOH)视角。相对于MOH为每位MS患者的医疗保健成本(2000加元)和估计避免的MOH成本,IFNβ-1b的年度直接治疗成本(16685加元)较高。

结果

对于RRMS女性患者,在“参考案例”假设下,治疗可使终身残疾年数减少10%。贴现前避免的每残疾年成本为189230加元(124892美元),5%贴现后为274842加元(181395美元)。替代情景的估计差异很大,但主要结果不变。

结论

使用扩展残疾状态量表,RRMS中因β-1b干扰素治疗而避免的每残疾年成本相当高。使用特定于MS或通用的健康相关生活质量结果测量方法得出的可比CE估计值甚至更高。需要进一步研究以更好地衡量RRMS中IFNβ-1b的治疗效果、对MS自然病史的改变以及净社会成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1b in slowing multiple sclerosis disability progression. First estimates.干扰素β-1b延缓多发性硬化症残疾进展的成本效益。初步估算。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Summer;16(3):751-67. doi: 10.1017/s026646230010203x.
2
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较疾病修饰药物用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543.
3
Treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta: an appraisal of cost-effectiveness and quality of life.用β-干扰素治疗多发性硬化症:成本效益与生活质量评估
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;68(2):144-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.2.144.
4
Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate in newly diagnosed non-primary progressive multiple sclerosis.干扰素β-1a、干扰素β-1b和醋酸格拉替雷在新诊断的非原发性进行性多发性硬化症中的成本效益
Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):554-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75007.x.
5
A cost-utility analysis of mitoxantrone hydrochloride and interferon beta-1b in the treatment of patients with secondary progressive or progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis.盐酸米托蒽醌与干扰素β-1b治疗继发进展型或复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的成本效用分析
Clin Ther. 2003 Feb;25(2):611-34. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80100-5.
6
Cost-effectiveness of four immunomodulatory therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a Markov model based on long-term clinical data.四种免疫调节疗法用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益:基于长期临床数据的马尔可夫模型
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Apr;13(3):245-61. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.3.245.
7
A health-economic evaluation of disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the German societal perspective.从德国社会角度评估治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物的卫生经济学价值。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):717-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.019.
8
Interferon-beta-1b: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.干扰素β-1b:其在复发缓解型和继发进展型多发性硬化症中应用的综述
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(8):521-46. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418080-00004.
9
Effects of cohort selection on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.队列选择对复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修饰药物成本效益分析结果的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jun;17(5):377-81. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.5.377.
10
Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,芬戈莫德与干扰素β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1088-96. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.693553. Epub 2012 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修正药物的成本效用和成本效益分析:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00478-7.
2
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.复发型多发性硬化症的经济学评估如何随时间演变?一项系统文献综述。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Modelling the cost effectiveness of disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: issues to consider.
模拟多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗的成本效益:需要考虑的问题。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jun;31(6):455-69. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0063-4.
4
Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature.多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的成本效益:文献系统评价
Autoimmune Dis. 2012;2012:784364. doi: 10.1155/2012/784364. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
5
Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis.评估多发性硬化症管理中的成本效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2009;1:61-78. doi: 10.2147/ceor.s4225. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
6
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.治疗多发性硬化症的药物经济学考虑。
Drugs. 2010 Sep 10;70(13):1677-91. doi: 10.2165/11538000-000000000-00000.
7
Cost-analysis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy after the introduction of new disease-modifying agents.意大利引入新型疾病修正药物后复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(7):409-20. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424070-00004.
8
Direct and indirect costs of Multiple Sclerosis in Baix Llobregat (Catalonia, Spain), according to disability.根据残疾情况,西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区baix Llobregat的多发性硬化症直接和间接成本
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Nov 1;6:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-143.
9
Thomas John (Jock) Murray, OC, MD, FRCP(C), MACP, LLD(HON), DSc(Hon), FRCP(Lon): a conversation with the editor. Interview by William Clifford Roberts.托马斯·约翰(乔克)·默里,加拿大勋章获得者,医学博士,加拿大皇家内科医师学会会员,美国内科医师学会会员,荣誉法学博士,荣誉理学博士,英国皇家内科医师学会会员:与编辑的对话。威廉·克利福德·罗伯茨访谈。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2003 Oct;16(4):469-85. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2003.11927944.
10
A comparison of health utility measures for the evaluation of multiple sclerosis treatments.用于评估多发性硬化症治疗的健康效用测量方法的比较。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;76(1):58-63. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.017897.