• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利引入新型疾病修正药物后复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本分析。

Cost-analysis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy after the introduction of new disease-modifying agents.

机构信息

Department of Human Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(7):409-20. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424070-00004.

DOI:10.2165/00044011-200424070-00004
PMID:17516727
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

During the last decade, several agents have proven to be effective in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), for example interferon-beta (IFNβ) and glatiramer acetate. This study aimed to perform a cost-analysis of the treatment of patients with RRMS in Italy after the introduction of these new agents.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study with systematic patient inclusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data gathered from 630 patients with confirmed RRMS over a 2-year period were evaluated. Overall, the direct cost over 2 years reached €11 073 100 thousand, corresponding to a per-patient cost of €17 576 (year of costing, 2001). The cost of disease-modifying agents represented approximately 77% of the total expenditure. IFNβ accounted for 94% of the expense of disease-modifying agents, corresponding to a 2-year cost per patient of €20 223. Although glatiramer acetate and immunoglobulins were also associated with a high level of expense, these were prescribed in only 3.8% and 1.1% of patients, respectively. Using regression analyses, IFNβ therapy, disability, number of days spent in hospital per year and the frequency of magnetic resonance imaging procedures were the main predictors of total costs.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, IFNβ treatment considerably modified the management of RRMS and was associated with a rise in cost of treatment per patient.

摘要

背景与目的

在过去的十年中,已有几种药物被证明对治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)有效,例如干扰素-β(IFNβ)和那他珠单抗。本研究旨在评估这些新药物引入意大利后 RRMS 患者的治疗成本分析。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性观察研究,采用系统的患者纳入方法。

方法与结果

在 2 年期间,共评估了 630 名确诊 RRMS 患者的数据。总体而言,2 年内的直接成本达到 1107.31 万欧元,每位患者的成本为 17576 欧元(计价年份为 2001 年)。疾病修正治疗药物的费用约占总支出的 77%。IFNβ 占疾病修正治疗药物费用的 94%,每位患者 2 年的治疗费用为 20223 欧元。虽然那他珠单抗和免疫球蛋白也与高昂的费用有关,但这两种药物仅分别占患者的 3.8%和 1.1%。通过回归分析,IFNβ 治疗、残疾、每年住院天数和磁共振成像检查的频率是总费用的主要预测因素。

结论

根据本研究的结果,IFNβ 治疗极大地改变了 RRMS 的管理方式,并且与每位患者的治疗费用增加有关。

相似文献

1
Cost-analysis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy after the introduction of new disease-modifying agents.意大利引入新型疾病修正药物后复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(7):409-20. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424070-00004.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of disease modifiying drugs (interferons and glatiramer acetate) as first line treatments in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.疾病修饰药物(干扰素和格拉替雷)作为缓解复发型多发性硬化症患者一线治疗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):424-33. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.654868. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
3
A health-economic evaluation of disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the German societal perspective.从德国社会角度评估治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物的卫生经济学价值。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):717-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.019.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of peginterferon beta-1a compared with interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,用聚乙二醇干扰素β-1a 与干扰素β-1a 和那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Jul;19(7):684-95. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1157080. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
5
Cost effectiveness and budget impact of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.那他珠单抗治疗复发型多发性硬化症的成本效果及预算影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jun;25(6):1445-54. doi: 10.1185/03007990902876040.
6
What is new in the treatment of multiple sclerosis?多发性硬化症治疗方面有哪些新进展?
Drugs. 2000 Mar;59(3):401-10. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059030-00002.
7
Evaluating the response to glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients.评估复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者对醋酸格拉替雷的反应。
Mult Scler. 2014 Oct;20(12):1602-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458514527863. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Cost of care according to disease-modifying therapy in Mexicans with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.根据疾病修正疗法,对墨西哥复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者进行的治疗费用评估。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2013 Dec;113(4):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s13760-013-0200-z. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.米托蒽醌:其在多发性硬化症中的应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):379-96. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418060-00010.
10
A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing--remitting multiple sclerosis: results after 18 months of therapy.一项前瞻性、开放标签治疗试验,比较干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼)、干扰素β-1b(倍泰龙)和醋酸格拉替雷(考帕松)对复发缓解型多发性硬化症复发率的影响:治疗18个月后的结果。
Mult Scler. 2001 Dec;7(6):349-53. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700601.

引用本文的文献

1
The Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden of Different Phenotypes of Multiple Sclerosis in Italy: Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.意大利不同表型多发性硬化症的流行病学、治疗模式及经济负担:复发缓解型多发性硬化症和继发进展型多发性硬化症
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 6;14:1327-1337. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S376005. eCollection 2022.
2
The Cost of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Develop Neutralizing Antibodies during Interferon Beta Therapy.在干扰素β治疗期间产生中和抗体的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的治疗成本
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159214. eCollection 2016.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Cost Effectiveness of Interferon-beta-1a in the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis : An Econometric Model.长效干扰素-β1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的长期成本效果:计量经济学模型。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(9):571-81. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323090-00003.
2
Economic evaluation of multiple sclerosis in the UK, Germany and France.英国、德国和法国多发性硬化症的经济评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 May;13(5 Pt 2):607-22. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813050-00013.
3
The economic cost of multiple sclerosis in Sweden in 1994.
Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature.
多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的成本效益:文献系统评价
Autoimmune Dis. 2012;2012:784364. doi: 10.1155/2012/784364. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
4
The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian MS centres.多发性硬化症患者的直接成本:来自意大利多发性硬化症中心的调查。
Neurol Sci. 2011 Dec;32(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0578-4. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
5
Multiple sclerosis in Italy: cost-of-illness study.意大利多发性硬化症:疾病成本研究。
Neurol Sci. 2011 Oct;32(5):787-94. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0499-2. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.治疗多发性硬化症的药物经济学考虑。
Drugs. 2010 Sep 10;70(13):1677-91. doi: 10.2165/11538000-000000000-00000.
7
Clinical and economic impact of a specialty care management program among patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study.多发性硬化症患者的专业护理管理计划的临床和经济影响:一项队列研究。
Mult Scler. 2010 Aug;16(8):956-63. doi: 10.1177/1352458510373487. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature.多发性硬化症的经济负担:文献系统综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(5):363-79. doi: 10.2165/11532230-000000000-00000.
9
Economic evaluation of treating clinically isolated syndrome and subsequent multiple sclerosis with interferon beta-1b.用β-1b干扰素治疗临床孤立综合征及后续多发性硬化症的经济学评估。
Neurol Sci. 2009 Feb;30(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10072-009-0015-0. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
10
Costs and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis in Europe.欧洲多发性硬化症患者的成本与生活质量
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77(8):918-26. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.090365. Epub 2006 May 11.
1994年瑞典多发性硬化症的经济成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 May;13(5 Pt 2):597-606. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813050-00012.
4
The costs of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional, multicenter cost-of-illness study in Italy.多发性硬化症的成本:意大利的一项横断面多中心疾病成本研究。
J Neurol. 2002 Feb;249(2):152-63. doi: 10.1007/pl00007858.
5
Prevalence, expenditures, utilization, and payment for persons with MS in insured populations.参保人群中多发性硬化症患者的患病率、支出、利用率及支付情况。
Neurology. 2002 Jan 8;58(1):37-43. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.1.37.
6
Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症推荐诊断标准:国际多发性硬化症诊断小组指南
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032.
7
PRISMS-4: Long-term efficacy of interferon-beta-1a in relapsing MS.PRISMS - 4:β-1a干扰素在复发型多发性硬化症中的长期疗效
Neurology. 2001 Jun 26;56(12):1628-36. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.12.1628.
8
Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1b in slowing multiple sclerosis disability progression. First estimates.干扰素β-1b延缓多发性硬化症残疾进展的成本效益。初步估算。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Summer;16(3):751-67. doi: 10.1017/s026646230010203x.
9
Long-term treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon-beta may be cost effective.使用β-干扰素对多发性硬化症进行长期治疗可能具有成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jul;18(1):45-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018010-00005.
10
Multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):938-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431307.