Van Schoor J, Joos G F, Pauwels R A
Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
Eur Respir J. 2000 Sep;16(3):514-33. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.016003514.x.
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), an abnormal increase in airflow limitation following the exposure to a stimulus, is an important pathophysiological characteristic of bronchial asthma. Because of heterogeneity of the airway response to different stimuli, the latter have been divided into direct and indirect stimuli. Direct stimuli cause airflow limitation by a direct action on the effector cells involved in the airflow limitation, while indirect stimuli exert their action essentially on inflammatory and neuronal cells that act as an intermediary between the stimulus and the effector cells. This manuscript reviews the clinical and experimental studies on the mechanisms involved in indirect BHR in patients with asthma. Pharmacological stimuli (adenosine, tachykinins, bradykinin, sodium metabisulphite/sulphur dioxide, and propranolol) as well as physical stimuli (exercise, nonisotonic aerosols, and isocapnic hyperventilation) are discussed. The results of the different direct and indirect bronchial challenge tests are only weakly correlated and are therefore not mutually interchangeable. Limited available data (studies on the effects of allergen avoidance and inhaled corticosteroids) suggest that indirectly acting bronchial stimuli (especially adenosine) might better reflect the degree of airway inflammation than directly acting stimuli. It remains to be established whether monitoring of indirect BHR as a surrogate marker of inflammation (in addition to symptoms and lung function) is of clinical relevance to the long-term management of asthmatic patients. This seems to be the case for the direct stimulus methacholine. More work needs to be performed to find out whether, indirect stimuli are more suitable in asthma monitoring than direct ones. Recommendations on the application of indirect challenges in clinical practice and research will shortly be available from the European Respiratory Society Task Force.
支气管高反应性(BHR)是指接触刺激物后气流受限异常增加,是支气管哮喘重要的病理生理特征。由于气道对不同刺激的反应具有异质性,刺激物已被分为直接刺激物和间接刺激物。直接刺激物通过直接作用于参与气流受限的效应细胞来引起气流受限,而间接刺激物主要作用于炎症细胞和神经细胞,这些细胞在刺激物和效应细胞之间起中介作用。本文综述了哮喘患者间接BHR相关机制的临床和实验研究。文中讨论了药理学刺激物(腺苷、速激肽、缓激肽、焦亚硫酸钠/二氧化硫和普萘洛尔)以及物理刺激物(运动、非等渗气雾剂和等碳酸过度通气)。不同直接和间接支气管激发试验的结果仅具有弱相关性,因此不能相互替代。有限的现有数据(关于避免变应原和吸入糖皮质激素作用的研究)表明,间接作用的支气管刺激物(尤其是腺苷)可能比直接作用的刺激物能更好地反映气道炎症程度。作为炎症替代标志物(除症状和肺功能外)的间接BHR监测对哮喘患者的长期管理是否具有临床意义仍有待确定。对于直接刺激物乙酰甲胆碱似乎是这样。需要开展更多工作以查明间接刺激物在哮喘监测中是否比直接刺激物更合适。欧洲呼吸学会特别工作组不久将发布关于在临床实践和研究中应用间接激发试验的建议。