Suppr超能文献

支气管高反应性在哮喘控制评估中的作用:哮喘中的气道高反应性:其测量方法及临床意义。

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the assessment of asthma control: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2 Suppl):11S-17S. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0231.

Abstract

The two key pathophysiologic features of asthma are bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation. Symptoms and lung function are the most accessible clinical markers for the diagnosis of asthma as well as for assessing asthma control using the most effective treatment of asthma, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). However, BHR and inflammation usually take longer to resolve using ICS compared with symptoms and lung function. BHR can be assessed using "direct" stimuli that act on the airway smooth muscle (eg, methacholine) or "indirect" stimuli that require the presence of airway inflammation (eg, exercise, osmotic stimuli). Although there are practical limitations in using BHR to assess asthma control, efforts have been made to make BHR more accessible and standardized. Some studies have demonstrated that treatment aimed to decrease BHR with direct stimuli can lead to improved asthma control; however, it often results in the use of higher doses of ICS. Furthermore, BHR to direct stimuli does not usually resolve using ICS because of a fixed component. By contrast, BHR with an indirect stimulus indicates a responsive smooth muscle that occurs only in the presence of inflammation sensitive to ICS (eg, mast cells, eosinophils). BHR to indirect stimuli does resolve using ICS. Because ICS target both key pathophysiologic features of asthma, assessing indirect BHR in the presence of ICS will identify resolution or persistence of BHR and airway inflammation. This may provide a more clinically relevant marker for asthma control that may also lead to improving the clinical usefulness of ICS.

摘要

哮喘的两个关键病理生理特征是支气管高反应性(BHR)和气道炎症。症状和肺功能是诊断哮喘以及评估哮喘控制最有效的治疗方法(吸入皮质类固醇)的最直接的临床标志物。然而,与症状和肺功能相比,BHR 和炎症通常需要更长的时间才能通过 ICS 得到缓解。BHR 可以通过作用于气道平滑肌的“直接”刺激物(如乙酰甲胆碱)或需要气道炎症存在的“间接”刺激物(如运动、渗透刺激物)来评估。尽管使用 BHR 评估哮喘控制存在实际限制,但已努力使 BHR 更易于获得和标准化。一些研究表明,旨在通过直接刺激物降低 BHR 的治疗可以改善哮喘控制;然而,这通常会导致更高剂量的 ICS 被使用。此外,由于存在固定成分,气道平滑肌对直接刺激物的 BHR 通常不会通过 ICS 得到缓解。相比之下,间接刺激物的 BHR 表示仅在对 ICS 敏感的炎症存在时发生的反应性平滑肌(例如肥大细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞)。气道平滑肌对间接刺激物的 BHR 可以通过 ICS 得到缓解。由于 ICS 靶向哮喘的两个关键病理生理特征,在 ICS 存在的情况下评估间接 BHR 将确定 BHR 和气道炎症的缓解或持续存在。这可能为哮喘控制提供更具临床相关性的标志物,也可能提高 ICS 的临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验