• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西热带稀树草原国家公园内的闪电火灾:重新思考管理策略。

Lightning fires in a brazilian savanna national park: rethinking management strategies.

机构信息

Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, São Paulo, S.P., Brazil 05508-900, BR.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2000 Dec;26(6):675-84. doi: 10.1007/s002670010124.

DOI:10.1007/s002670010124
PMID:11029117
Abstract

Fire occurrences and their sources were monitored in Emas National Park, Brazil (17°49'-18°28'S; 52°39'-53°10'W) from June 1995 to May 1999. The extent of burned area and weather conditions were registered. Forty-five fires were recorded and mapped on a GIS during this study. Four fires occurred in the dry winter season (June-August; 7,942 ha burned), all caused by humans; 10 fires occurred in the seasonally transitional months (May and September) (33,386 ha burned); 31 fires occurred in the wet season, of which 30 were caused by lightning inside the park (29,326 ha burned), and one started outside the park (866 ha burned). Wet season lightning fires started in the open vegetation (wet field or grassy savanna) at a flat plateau, an area that showed significantly higher fire incidence. On average, winter fires burned larger areas and spread more quickly, compared to lightning fires, and fire suppression was necessary to extinguish them. Most lightning fires were patchy and extinguished primarily by rain. Lightning fires in the wet season, previously considered unimportant episodes, were shown to be very frequent and probably represent the natural fire pattern in the region. Lightning fires should be regarded as ecologically beneficial, as they create natural barriers to the spread of winter fires. The present fire management in the park is based on the burning of preventive firebreaks in the dry season and exclusion of any other fire. This policy does not take advantage of the beneficial effects of the natural fire regime and may in fact reduce biodiversity. The results presented here stress the need for reevaluating present policies and management procedures concerning fire in cerrado conservation areas.

摘要

1995 年 6 月至 1999 年 5 月期间,在巴西伊马司国家公园(南纬 17°49′-18°28′,西经 52°39′-53°10′)对火灾发生情况及其火源进行了监测。记录并在 GIS 上绘制了过火面积和天气条件图。在此研究期间,共记录了 45 起火灾并进行了定位。其中 4 起火灾发生在旱季(6-8 月,7942 公顷被烧毁),均由人为引起;10 起火灾发生在季节性过渡月份(5 月和 9 月)(33386 公顷被烧毁);31 起火灾发生在雨季,其中 30 起是公园内闪电引起的(29326 公顷被烧毁),一起是公园外引起的(866 公顷被烧毁)。雨季闪电火灾发生在一个平坦高原上的开阔植被(湿地或草地稀树草原),该地区火灾发生率显著较高。与闪电火灾相比,冬季火灾的过火面积更大,蔓延速度更快,需要进行灭火才能扑灭。大多数闪电火灾呈斑片状,主要因降雨而熄灭。雨季闪电火灾以前被认为是不重要的事件,但现在发现它们非常频繁,可能代表了该地区的自然火灾模式。闪电火灾应被视为生态有益的,因为它们为冬季火灾的蔓延创造了天然屏障。目前公园里的火灾管理是基于旱季预防性燃烧防火带和排除任何其他火源。这一政策没有利用自然火灾机制的有益影响,实际上可能会降低生物多样性。这里呈现的结果强调了需要重新评估有关塞拉多保护区火灾的现有政策和管理程序。

相似文献

1
Lightning fires in a brazilian savanna national park: rethinking management strategies.巴西热带稀树草原国家公园内的闪电火灾:重新思考管理策略。
Environ Manage. 2000 Dec;26(6):675-84. doi: 10.1007/s002670010124.
2
Seasonality of fire weather strongly influences fire regimes in South Florida savanna-grassland landscapes.火灾天气的季节性对南佛罗里达稀树草原 - 草地景观中的火灾模式有强烈影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 9;10(1):e0116952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116952. eCollection 2015.
3
An evaluation of contemporary savanna fire regimes in the Canastra National Park, Brazil: Outcomes of fire suppression policies.巴西卡南德拉国家公园当代稀树草原火行为的评估:火灾抑制政策的结果。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 1;205:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.053. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
4
Lightning patterns in the Pantanal: Untangling natural and anthropogenic-induced wildfires.潘塔纳尔地区的闪电模式:解开自然和人为引发野火的谜团。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 10;820:153021. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153021. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA.美国加利福尼亚州西北部火灾严重程度、规模和数量的趋势和原因。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Jan;22(1):184-203. doi: 10.1890/10-2108.1.
6
Effects of weed-management burning on reptile assemblages in Australian tropical savannas.杂草管理焚烧对澳大利亚热带稀树草原爬行动物群落的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Feb;23(1):103-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01074.x. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
7
Effects of fire on woody vegetation structure in African savanna.火对非洲热带稀树草原木本植被结构的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Oct;20(7):1865-75. doi: 10.1890/09-0929.1.
8
A spatio-temporal analysis of fire recurrence and extent for semi-arid savanna ecosystems in Southern Africa using moderate-resolution satellite imagery.利用中分辨率卫星图像对南非半干旱热带稀树草原生态系统的火灾复发和范围进行时空分析。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jun 15;100:72-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Modelling fire frequency in a Cerrado savanna protected area.模拟塞拉多稀树草原保护区的火灾发生频率。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 23;9(7):e102380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102380. eCollection 2014.
10
Multiple remote sensing data sources to assess spatio-temporal patterns of fire incidence over Campos Amazônicos Savanna Vegetation Enclave (Brazilian Amazon).利用多种遥感数据源评估亚马逊河干草原植被生态区(巴西亚马逊地区)火灾发生率的时空格局。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;601-602:142-158. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.194. Epub 2017 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerrado ash reduces volatile emissions from faeces but does not influence the olfactory responses of the dung beetles.塞拉多火山灰可减少粪便中的挥发性排放物,但不影响蜣螂的嗅觉反应。
Naturwissenschaften. 2025 Sep 9;112(5):68. doi: 10.1007/s00114-025-02022-x.
2
The fire regimes of the Cerrado and their changes through time.塞拉多的火灾状况及其随时间的变化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;380(1924):20230460. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0460. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
3
Beyond fire: Flower production naturally occurs and is also influenced by leaf removal in a Neotropical savanna herb.
除火之外:在新热带草原草本植物中,花的产生不仅是自然发生的,而且还受到叶片去除的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0305098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305098. eCollection 2024.
4
Feedback in tropical forests of the Anthropocene.人类世热带森林的反馈。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Sep;28(17):5041-5061. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16293. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
Multidecadal effects of fire in a grassland biodiversity hotspot: Does pyrodiversity enhance plant diversity?草原生物多样性热点地区火的多十年效应:火多样性是否会提高植物多样性?
Ecol Appl. 2021 Sep;31(6):e02391. doi: 10.1002/eap.2391. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
The Role of Vegetation on the Dynamics of Water and Fire in the Cerrado Ecosystems: Implications for Management and Conservation.植被在塞拉多生态系统水与火动态中的作用:对管理和保护的启示
Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 18;9(12):1803. doi: 10.3390/plants9121803.
7
The role of fire disturbance on habitat structure and bird communities in South Brazilian Highland Grasslands.火干扰对南巴塔哥尼亚高草原生境结构和鸟类群落的作用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 12;10(1):19708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76758-z.
8
Persistent fire foci in all biomes undermine the Paris Agreement in Brazil.在所有生物群落中持续存在的火点破坏了巴西的《巴黎协定》。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72571-w.
9
Long-Term Effects of Periodical Fires on Archaeal Communities from Brazilian Cerrado Soils.定期火灾对巴西塞拉多土壤古菌群落的长期影响。
Archaea. 2019 Jan 27;2019:6957210. doi: 10.1155/2019/6957210. eCollection 2019.
10
The biodiversity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical savanna.热带稀树草原碳固存的生物多样性代价。
Sci Adv. 2017 Aug 30;3(8):e1701284. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701284. eCollection 2017 Aug.