Orenstein W A, Strebel P M, Papania M, Sutter R W, Bellini W J, Cochi S L
National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. 30333, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1521-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.10.1521.
Measles eradication would avert the current annual 1 million deaths and save the $1.5 billion in treatment and prevention costs due to measles in perpetuity. The authors evaluate the biological feasibility of eradicating measles according to 4 criteria: (1) the role of humans in maintaining transmission, (2) the availability of accurate diagnostic tests, (3) the existence of effective vaccines, and (4) the need to demonstrate elimination of measles from a large geographic area. Recent successes in interrupting measles transmission in the United States, most other countries in the Western Hemisphere, and selected countries in other regions provide evidence for the feasibility of global eradication. Potential impediments to eradication include (1) lack of political will in some industrialized countries, (2) transmission among adults, (3) increasing urbanization and population density, (4) the HIV epidemic, (5) waning immunity and the possibility of transmission from subclinical cases, and (6) risk of unsafe injections. Despite these challenges, a compelling case can be made in favor of measles eradication, and the authors believe that it is in our future. The question is when.
消除麻疹将避免目前每年100万人死亡,并永久节省因麻疹产生的15亿美元治疗和预防成本。作者根据4项标准评估消除麻疹的生物学可行性:(1)人类在维持传播中的作用;(2)准确诊断测试的可用性;(3)有效疫苗的存在;(4)需要证明在大片地理区域消除了麻疹。最近在美国、西半球大多数其他国家以及其他地区的一些选定国家成功阻断麻疹传播,为全球消除麻疹的可行性提供了证据。消除麻疹的潜在障碍包括:(1)一些工业化国家缺乏政治意愿;(2)成人之间的传播;(3)城市化和人口密度增加;(4)艾滋病流行;(5)免疫力下降以及亚临床病例传播的可能性;(6)不安全注射的风险。尽管存在这些挑战,但有充分理由支持消除麻疹,作者认为这是我们未来能够实现的。问题在于何时实现。