Singh M M, Kay S R
Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Aug 21;43(2):115-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00421013.
The treatment process with two prototypic neuroleptics--haloperidol and chlorpromazine--and the nontherapeutic effects of trihexyphenidyl on this process were studied in carefully matched groups of ten schizophrenics each, using a "double-blind", repeated-measure, longitudinal research design. Measurements of various aspects of psychopathology, social participation and clinical indices of arousal were made periodically and objective test of cognition and attention were given. The two treatment groups were highly comparable in epidemiological and clinical terms and differed significantly during the baseline period in only one of the 39 parameters. Longitudinal nonparametric analyses showed that significant therepeutic changes tended to occur more quickly and involved a wider spectrum of schizophrenic phenomena with haloperidol than with chlorpromazine. Parametric analyses also indicated that at the completion of the study, haloperidol-treated patients had significant improvement in many more dimensions than the chlorpromazine-treated patients and that the changes with haloperidol were generally of greater magnitude. At the same time, chlorpromazine treatment seemed to be more susceptible to the antagonistic effects of trihexyphenidyl. No differential patterns of responses were noted for the two neuroleptics to provide any clinical validity to the distinction often made between "sedative" and "activating" neuroleptics. These data were in agreement with those from a previous comparative study which had a very different research design and a somewhat different type of schizophrenic population. The clinical and potency differences between the two neuroleptics were again explained on the basis of the fact that chlorpromazine has much stronger built-in anticholinergic properties, which may be acting in opposition to the antipsychotic activity. It was suggested that the degree of inherent anticholinergic activity may be an important determinant of potency differences among presently known neuroleptics. The possible role of cholinergic mechanisms in schizophrenia was discussed.
采用“双盲”、重复测量、纵向研究设计,在两组精心匹配的每组十名精神分裂症患者中,研究了两种典型抗精神病药物——氟哌啶醇和氯丙嗪的治疗过程,以及苯海索对该过程的非治疗作用。定期对精神病理学、社会参与度和唤醒临床指标的各个方面进行测量,并进行认知和注意力的客观测试。两个治疗组在流行病学和临床方面具有高度可比性,在基线期仅39个参数中的一个参数上存在显著差异。纵向非参数分析表明,与氯丙嗪相比,氟哌啶醇的显著治疗变化往往发生得更快,涉及的精神分裂症现象范围更广。参数分析还表明,在研究结束时,氟哌啶醇治疗的患者在更多维度上有显著改善,且氟哌啶醇引起的变化幅度通常更大。同时,氯丙嗪治疗似乎更容易受到苯海索的拮抗作用影响。未观察到两种抗精神病药物有不同的反应模式,无法为“镇静性”和“激活型”抗精神病药物之间常作的区分提供任何临床依据。这些数据与之前一项比较研究的数据一致,该研究的研究设计非常不同,精神分裂症患者类型也有所不同。两种抗精神病药物的临床和效力差异再次基于氯丙嗪具有更强的内在抗胆碱能特性这一事实来解释,这可能与抗精神病活性相反。有人提出,内在抗胆碱能活性的程度可能是目前已知抗精神病药物效力差异的一个重要决定因素。还讨论了胆碱能机制在精神分裂症中的可能作用。