Clarke C E, Davies P
Department of Neurology, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;69(5):590-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.5.590.
To perform a systematic review of studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of acute challenge tests with levodopa and/or apomorphine in parkinsonian syndromes to assess their value in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
A literature search including Medline and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies published in any language comparing acute levodopa and/or apomorphine response with chronic levodopa therapy in parkinsonian syndromes. Abstracted sensitivity and specificity data were summarised using variance weighting and conditional logistic regression for studies comparing two challenge tests.
Thirteen studies were located: four examining de novo patients and nine examining patients with well established idiopathic Parkinson's disease and non-parkinsonian conditions. Despite the significant heterogeneity in the methodologies employed, the comparable results suggest that this had little effect on the accuracy of the tests. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of established idiopathic Parkinson's disease was: apomorphine 0.86 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.78-0.94), acute levodopa 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.85), and chronic levodopa therapy 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.99). The specificity for the diagnosis of established idiopathic Parkinson's disease was: apomorphine 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96), acute levodopa 0.87 (95% CI 0. 77-0.97), and chronic levodopa therapy 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.93). The number of patients positive for each test divided by the number with clinically diagnosed de novo disease was: apomorphine 0.63 (95% CI 0. 56-0.70), acute levodopa 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.80), and chronic levodopa therapy 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82).
The accuracy of the acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests is similar to, but not superior than, that of chronic levodopa therapy in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. As most patients will be given chronic dopamimetic therapy, these tests add nothing while causing significant adverse events and additional cost.
对研究左旋多巴和/或阿扑吗啡急性激发试验在帕金森综合征诊断准确性的研究进行系统评价,以评估其在特发性帕金森病诊断中的价值。
检索包括Medline和Cochrane图书馆在内的文献,查找以任何语言发表的比较帕金森综合征患者急性左旋多巴和/或阿扑吗啡反应与慢性左旋多巴治疗的研究。对于比较两种激发试验的研究,采用方差加权和条件逻辑回归对提取的敏感性和特异性数据进行汇总。
共检索到13项研究:4项研究初发患者,9项研究已确诊的特发性帕金森病患者和非帕金森病患者。尽管所采用的方法存在显著异质性,但可比结果表明这对试验准确性影响不大。已确诊的特发性帕金森病诊断的敏感性为:阿扑吗啡0.86(95%置信区间(95%CI)0.78 - 0.94),急性左旋多巴0.75(95%CI 0.64 - 0.85),慢性左旋多巴治疗0.91(95%CI 0.85 - 0.99)。已确诊的特发性帕金森病诊断的特异性为:阿扑吗啡0.85(95%CI 0.74 - 0.96),急性左旋多巴0.87(95%CI 0.77 - 0.97),慢性左旋多巴治疗0.77(95%CI 0.61 - 0.93)。每项试验阳性患者数除以临床诊断为初发疾病的患者数为:阿扑吗啡0.63(95%CI 0.56 - 0.70),急性左旋多巴0.69(95%CI {0.59 - 0.80}),慢性左旋多巴治疗0.76(95%CI 0.70 - 0.82)。
在特发性帕金森病诊断中,急性左旋多巴和阿扑吗啡激发试验的准确性与慢性左旋多巴治疗相似,但不优于慢性左旋多巴治疗。由于大多数患者将接受慢性多巴胺能治疗,这些试验并无额外价值,反而会导致显著不良事件和额外费用。