Zajki-Zechmeister Tibor, Kögl Mariella, Kalsberger Kerstin, Franthal Sebastian, Homayoon Nina, Katschnig-Winter Petra, Wenzel Karoline, Zajki-Zechmeister László, Schwingenschuh Petra
Tremitas GmbH, Schleppe-Platz 5/1/2, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, Graz, 8036, Austria.
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 19;6(8):e04702. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04702. eCollection 2020 Aug.
An objective evaluation of tremor severity is necessary to document the course of disease, the efficacy of treatment, or interventions in clinical trials. Most available objective quantification devices are complex, immobile, or not validated.
We used the TREMITAS-System that comprises a pen-shaped sensor for tremor quantification. The Power of Main Peak and the Total Power were used as surrogate markers for tremor amplitude. Tremor severity was assessed by the TREMITAS-System and relevant subscores of the MDS-UPDRS and TETRAS rating scales in 14 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 16 patients with Essential tremor (ET) off and on therapy. We compared tremor amplitudes assessed during wearable and hand-held constellations.
We found significant correlations between tremor amplitudes captured by TREM and tremor severity assessed by the MDS-UPDRS in PD (r = 0.638-0.779) and the TETRAS in ET (r = 0.597-0. 704) off and on therapy. The TREMITAS-System captured the L-Dopa-induced improvement of tremor in PD patients (p = 0.027). Tremor amplitudes did not differ between the handheld and wearable constellation (p > 0.05).
We confirm the results of previous studies using inertial based sensors that tremor severity and drug-induced changes of tremor severity can be quantified using inertial based sensors. The assessment of tremor amplitudes was not influenced by using a handheld or wearable constellation.
The TREMITAS-System can be used to quantify rest tremor in PD and postural tremor in ET and is capable of detecting clinically relevant changes in tremor in clinical and research settings.
对震颤严重程度进行客观评估对于记录疾病进程、治疗效果或临床试验中的干预措施是必要的。大多数现有的客观量化设备复杂、不可移动或未经验证。
我们使用了TREMITAS系统,该系统包括一个用于震颤量化的笔形传感器。主峰功率和总功率被用作震颤幅度的替代指标。在14例帕金森病(PD)患者和16例特发性震颤(ET)患者接受治疗和未接受治疗时,通过TREMITAS系统以及MDS-UPDRS和TETRAS评定量表的相关子评分来评估震颤严重程度。我们比较了可穿戴和手持状态下评估的震颤幅度。
我们发现,在PD患者中,TREM捕获的震颤幅度与MDS-UPDRS评估的震颤严重程度之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.638 - 0.779),在ET患者中,与TETRAS评估的震颤严重程度之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.597 - 0.704),无论治疗与否。TREMITAS系统捕获了PD患者左旋多巴诱导的震颤改善(p = 0.027)。手持和可穿戴状态下的震颤幅度没有差异(p > 0.05)。
我们证实了先前使用基于惯性传感器的研究结果,即可以使用基于惯性的传感器量化震颤严重程度和药物引起的震颤严重程度变化。使用手持或可穿戴状态对震颤幅度的评估没有影响。
TREMITAS系统可用于量化PD患者的静止性震颤和ET患者的姿势性震颤,并且能够在临床和研究环境中检测到震颤的临床相关变化。