Suppr超能文献

常规与选择性抗真菌治疗对癌症患者真菌感染的控制

Routine versus selective antifungal administration for control of fungal infections in patients with cancer.

作者信息

Gotzsche P C, Johansen H K

机构信息

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Dept. 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, DENMARK, 2200.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD000026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systemic fungal infection is considered to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia. Antifungal drugs are often given prophylactically, or to patients with persistent fever.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of antifungal drugs in cancer patients with neutropenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE (November 1999) and the reference lists of articles. We searched the proceedings of the ICAAC, General Meeting of the ASM (from 1990 to 1999), and the 7th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (1995 to 1999) and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of amphotericin B, AmBisome, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, or itraconazole compared with placebo or no treatment in cancer patients with neutropenia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and abstracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-nine trials involving 3875 patients were included. Intravenous amphotericin B reduced total mortality (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.02, P=0.06) based on 8 trials. This borderline result was confirmed by three trials which compared lipid soluble amphotericin B (AmBisome) with smaller doses of standard amphotericin B; the trials demonstrated an effect of AmBisome on mortality, relative risk 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.99). The risk difference for the two estimates combined is 0.040 (95% CI 0.012 to 0.068) which means that 25 patients (95% CI 15 to 83) would need to be treated with intravenous amphotericin B to avoid one death. In contrast, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole and itraconazole had no effect on mortality. The incidence of invasive fungal infection decreased with administration of amphotericin B (relative risk 0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.76), fluconazole (relative risk 0.39, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.57) and itraconazole (relative risk 0.45, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.99), but not with miconazole or ketoconazole.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous amphotericin B is the only antifungal agent which has a documented effect on mortality, and there is not sufficient evidence to judge the relative merits of other antifungal agents. This drug should therefore be preferred for prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia.

摘要

背景

系统性真菌感染被认为是癌症患者发病和死亡的重要原因,尤其是中性粒细胞减少的患者。抗真菌药物通常用于预防性给药,或用于持续发热的患者。

目的

本综述的目的是评估抗真菌药物对中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者的疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE(1999年11月)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们检索了美国微生物学会年会(1990年至1999年)、美国传染病学会年会(1990年至1999年)和第七届欧洲临床微生物学和传染病大会(1995年至1999年)的会议记录,并联系了该领域的研究人员。

入选标准

在中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者中,将两性霉素B、安必素、氟康唑、酮康唑、咪康唑或伊曲康唑与安慰剂或不治疗进行比较的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价者独立评估试验的合格性、方法学质量并提取数据。

主要结果

纳入了29项试验,涉及3875名患者。基于8项试验,静脉注射两性霉素B降低了总死亡率(相对危险度0.72,95%可信区间0.51至1.02,P = 0.06)。三项将脂质体两性霉素B(安必素)与小剂量标准两性霉素B进行比较的试验证实了这一边缘性结果;这些试验表明安必素对死亡率有影响,相对危险度0.70(95%可信区间0.50至0.99)。两项估计值合并后的风险差为0.040(95%可信区间0.012至0.068),这意味着需要25名患者(95%可信区间15至83)接受静脉注射两性霉素B治疗以避免一例死亡。相比之下,氟康唑、酮康唑、咪康唑和伊曲康唑对死亡率没有影响。两性霉素B(相对危险度0.39,95%可信区间0.20至0.76)、氟康唑(相对危险度0.39,95%可信区间0.27至0.57)和伊曲康唑(相对危险度0.45,95%可信区间0.20至0.99)的给药可降低侵袭性真菌感染的发生率,但咪康唑或酮康唑则不然。

综述作者结论

静脉注射两性霉素B是唯一对死亡率有文献记载疗效的抗真菌药物,没有足够的证据来判断其他抗真菌药物的相对优缺点。因此,对于中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者,预防性或经验性抗真菌治疗应首选该药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验