• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外局部麻醉药与基于阿片类药物的镇痛方案对腹部手术后胃肠道麻痹、术后恶心呕吐及疼痛的影响

Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl J B

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, Copenhagen County, Denmark, 2730.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001893
PMID:11034732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal paralysis, nausea and vomiting, and pain, are major clinical problems following abdominal surgery. Anaesthetic and analgesic techniques that reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and prevent or reduce postoperative ileus, may reduce postoperative morbidity, duration of hospitalisation and hospital costs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids, on postoperative gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, PONV and surgical/anaesthetic complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with systemic or epidural opioids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Collected data included treatment in active (local anaesthetic) and control (opioid based) groups, time to first postoperative stool, time to first postoperative flatus, gastric emptying measured by the paracetamol absorption test, duration of the passage of barium sulphate, pain assessments, use of supplementary analgesics, nausea, vomiting and surgical/anaesthetic complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Most studies in this review involved a small number of patients. Furthermore half of the studies indicated a poor level of methodology in particular regarding blinding and report of withdrawals. Heterogeneity of included studies was substantial. Results consistently showed reduced time to return of gastrointestinal function in the epidural local anaesthetic group compared with groups receiving systemic or epidural opioid (37 hours and 24 hours, respectively). Postoperative pain was comparable. Two studies compared the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on gastrointestinal function. One study favoured epidural local anaesthetic and one study was indifferent. A meta analysis of five of eight studies comparing the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on postoperative pain, yielded a reduction in VAS pain scores (0-100 mm) on the first postoperative day of 15 mm, in favour of the combination. No significant differences in PONV were observed between epidural local anaesthetic and opioid based regimens.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epidural local anaesthetics to patients undergoing laparotomy reduce gastrointestinal paralysis compared with systemic or epidural opioids, with comparable postoperative pain relief. Addition of opioid to epidural local anaesthetic may provide superior postoperative analgesia compared with epidural local anaesthetics alone. The effect of additional epidural opioid on gastrointestinal function is so far unsettled. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effect of combinations of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid with epidural local anaesthetic alone on postoperative gastrointestinal function and pain are warranted.

摘要

背景

胃肠麻痹、恶心呕吐及疼痛是腹部手术后的主要临床问题。能减轻疼痛及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、预防或减轻术后肠梗阻的麻醉和镇痛技术,可能会降低术后发病率、缩短住院时间并减少住院费用。

目的

比较术后硬膜外局部麻醉与基于全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物的方案,对术后胃肠功能、术后疼痛、PONV及手术/麻醉并发症的影响。

检索策略

通过计算机检索Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE来识别试验,并检查试验及综述文章的参考文献列表。

选择标准

比较术后硬膜外局部麻醉与全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物效果的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

收集的数据包括治疗组(局部麻醉)和对照组(基于阿片类药物)的治疗情况、术后首次排便时间、术后首次排气时间、通过对乙酰氨基酚吸收试验测量的胃排空情况、硫酸钡通过时间、疼痛评估、辅助镇痛药的使用、恶心、呕吐及手术/麻醉并发症。

主要结果

本综述中的大多数研究涉及的患者数量较少。此外,一半的研究表明方法学水平较差,尤其是在盲法和失访报告方面。纳入研究的异质性很大。结果一致显示,与接受全身或硬膜外阿片类药物的组相比,硬膜外局部麻醉组恢复胃肠功能的时间缩短(分别为37小时和24小时)。术后疼痛相当。两项研究比较了硬膜外局部麻醉与硬膜外局部麻醉联合阿片类药物对胃肠功能的影响。一项研究支持硬膜外局部麻醉,另一项研究无差异。八项研究中有五项比较了硬膜外局部麻醉与硬膜外局部麻醉联合阿片类药物对术后疼痛的影响,进行荟萃分析后发现,术后第一天视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分降低了15mm,支持联合用药。硬膜外局部麻醉与基于阿片类药物的方案在PONV方面未观察到显著差异。

综述作者结论

与全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物相比,对接受剖腹手术的患者使用硬膜外局部麻醉可减轻胃肠麻痹,术后疼痛缓解程度相当。与单独使用硬膜外局部麻醉相比,在硬膜外局部麻醉中添加阿片类药物可能提供更好的术后镇痛效果。目前,额外使用硬膜外阿片类药物对胃肠功能的影响尚不确定。有必要进行随机对照试验,比较硬膜外局部麻醉与阿片类药物联合使用与单独使用硬膜外局部麻醉对术后胃肠功能和疼痛的影响。

相似文献

1
Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery.硬膜外局部麻醉药与基于阿片类药物的镇痛方案对腹部手术后胃肠道麻痹、术后恶心呕吐及疼痛的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.
2
Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.硬膜外局部麻醉药与阿片类镇痛方案用于腹部手术后胃肠道麻痹、呕吐及疼痛的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 16;7(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2.
3
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.成人围手术期持续静脉输注利多卡因用于术后疼痛及恢复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.
4
Epidural analgesia for pain relief following hip or knee replacement.髋关节或膝关节置换术后用于缓解疼痛的硬膜外镇痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(3):CD003071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003071.
5
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery.腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞预防腹腔镜及机器人辅助妇科手术女性患者术后疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 3;4(4):CD015145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015145.pub2.
6
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
8
Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.用于分娩时产妇疼痛管理的胃肠外阿片类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub3.
9
Regional analgesia techniques for postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery: a network meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术后疼痛的区域镇痛技术:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD014818. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014818.pub2.
10
Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.局部麻醉药和区域麻醉与传统镇痛方法用于预防成人和儿童术后持续性疼痛的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD007105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007105.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Electroacupuncture in the treatment of gastrointestinal dysfunction after laparoscopic nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis.电针治疗腹腔镜肾切除术后胃肠功能障碍的回顾性分析
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04894-y.
2
Prospective Survey of Postoperative Pain in Japan: A Multicenter, Observational Study.日本术后疼痛的前瞻性调查:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 10;14(4):1130. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041130.
3
Post-Operative Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Incidence of Major Complications according to Specific Safety Standardized Documentation: A Large Retrospective Dual Center Experience.
根据特定安全标准化文件的术后胸段硬膜外镇痛及主要并发症发生率:一项大型回顾性双中心经验
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 29;13(12):1672. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121672.
4
The Effect of Caudal Ropivacaine and Morphine on Postoperative Analgesia in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.尾侧罗哌卡因和吗啡对全腹腔镜子宫切除术后镇痛的影响:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2023 Oct 4;16:3379-3390. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S426820. eCollection 2023.
5
The EUPEMEN (EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking) Protocol for Bowel Obstruction: Recommendations for Perioperative Care.欧洲围手术期医学网络(EUPEMEN)肠梗阻诊疗方案:围手术期护理建议
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 21;12(13):4185. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134185.
6
An Observational Study to Assess Postoperative Pain Control and Formulate a Comprehensive Approach to the Implementation of Policy Change for Pain Control in Postoperative Units.一项观察性研究,旨在评估术后疼痛控制情况,并制定全面方法以在术后病房实施疼痛控制政策变革。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e33026. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33026. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
A comparison between thoracic epidural analgesia and rectus sheath catheter analgesia after open midline major abdominal surgery: randomized clinical trial.开腹正中大型腹部手术后胸段硬膜外镇痛与腹直肌鞘导管镇痛的比较:随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac055.
8
Opioid-Sparing Analgesia Impacts the Perioperative Anesthetic Management in Major Abdominal Surgery.阿片类药物节约型镇痛对大型腹部手术围手术期麻醉管理的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 28;58(4):487. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040487.
9
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Local Anesthetic Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Hernia Repair in Daycare Procedure: A Randomized Control Trial.腹横肌平面阻滞与局部麻醉伤口浸润用于日间手术成人疝气修补术后镇痛的随机对照试验
Cureus. 2022 Jan 17;14(1):e21311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21311. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Adverse Effects between Variable-Rate Feedback Infusion and Conventional Fixed-Rate Basal Infusion Modes of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia following Open Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.术后不同输注模式对开腹胃癌根治术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛效果及不良反应的影响:一项随机对照研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 19;18(16):8777. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168777.