Suppr超能文献

硬膜外局部麻醉药与基于阿片类药物的镇痛方案对腹部手术后胃肠道麻痹、术后恶心呕吐及疼痛的影响

Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl J B

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, Copenhagen County, Denmark, 2730.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal paralysis, nausea and vomiting, and pain, are major clinical problems following abdominal surgery. Anaesthetic and analgesic techniques that reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and prevent or reduce postoperative ileus, may reduce postoperative morbidity, duration of hospitalisation and hospital costs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids, on postoperative gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, PONV and surgical/anaesthetic complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with systemic or epidural opioids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Collected data included treatment in active (local anaesthetic) and control (opioid based) groups, time to first postoperative stool, time to first postoperative flatus, gastric emptying measured by the paracetamol absorption test, duration of the passage of barium sulphate, pain assessments, use of supplementary analgesics, nausea, vomiting and surgical/anaesthetic complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Most studies in this review involved a small number of patients. Furthermore half of the studies indicated a poor level of methodology in particular regarding blinding and report of withdrawals. Heterogeneity of included studies was substantial. Results consistently showed reduced time to return of gastrointestinal function in the epidural local anaesthetic group compared with groups receiving systemic or epidural opioid (37 hours and 24 hours, respectively). Postoperative pain was comparable. Two studies compared the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on gastrointestinal function. One study favoured epidural local anaesthetic and one study was indifferent. A meta analysis of five of eight studies comparing the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on postoperative pain, yielded a reduction in VAS pain scores (0-100 mm) on the first postoperative day of 15 mm, in favour of the combination. No significant differences in PONV were observed between epidural local anaesthetic and opioid based regimens.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epidural local anaesthetics to patients undergoing laparotomy reduce gastrointestinal paralysis compared with systemic or epidural opioids, with comparable postoperative pain relief. Addition of opioid to epidural local anaesthetic may provide superior postoperative analgesia compared with epidural local anaesthetics alone. The effect of additional epidural opioid on gastrointestinal function is so far unsettled. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effect of combinations of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid with epidural local anaesthetic alone on postoperative gastrointestinal function and pain are warranted.

摘要

背景

胃肠麻痹、恶心呕吐及疼痛是腹部手术后的主要临床问题。能减轻疼痛及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、预防或减轻术后肠梗阻的麻醉和镇痛技术,可能会降低术后发病率、缩短住院时间并减少住院费用。

目的

比较术后硬膜外局部麻醉与基于全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物的方案,对术后胃肠功能、术后疼痛、PONV及手术/麻醉并发症的影响。

检索策略

通过计算机检索Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE来识别试验,并检查试验及综述文章的参考文献列表。

选择标准

比较术后硬膜外局部麻醉与全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物效果的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

收集的数据包括治疗组(局部麻醉)和对照组(基于阿片类药物)的治疗情况、术后首次排便时间、术后首次排气时间、通过对乙酰氨基酚吸收试验测量的胃排空情况、硫酸钡通过时间、疼痛评估、辅助镇痛药的使用、恶心、呕吐及手术/麻醉并发症。

主要结果

本综述中的大多数研究涉及的患者数量较少。此外,一半的研究表明方法学水平较差,尤其是在盲法和失访报告方面。纳入研究的异质性很大。结果一致显示,与接受全身或硬膜外阿片类药物的组相比,硬膜外局部麻醉组恢复胃肠功能的时间缩短(分别为37小时和24小时)。术后疼痛相当。两项研究比较了硬膜外局部麻醉与硬膜外局部麻醉联合阿片类药物对胃肠功能的影响。一项研究支持硬膜外局部麻醉,另一项研究无差异。八项研究中有五项比较了硬膜外局部麻醉与硬膜外局部麻醉联合阿片类药物对术后疼痛的影响,进行荟萃分析后发现,术后第一天视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分降低了15mm,支持联合用药。硬膜外局部麻醉与基于阿片类药物的方案在PONV方面未观察到显著差异。

综述作者结论

与全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物相比,对接受剖腹手术的患者使用硬膜外局部麻醉可减轻胃肠麻痹,术后疼痛缓解程度相当。与单独使用硬膜外局部麻醉相比,在硬膜外局部麻醉中添加阿片类药物可能提供更好的术后镇痛效果。目前,额外使用硬膜外阿片类药物对胃肠功能的影响尚不确定。有必要进行随机对照试验,比较硬膜外局部麻醉与阿片类药物联合使用与单独使用硬膜外局部麻醉对术后胃肠功能和疼痛的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验