• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为非癌症患者提供姑息治疗的伦理依据。

Ethical arguments for providing palliative care to non-cancer patients.

作者信息

Wasson K

机构信息

Palliative Care Centre, Camden and Islington Community Health Services NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Palliat Nurs. 2000 Feb;6(2):66-70. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2000.6.2.8946.

DOI:10.12968/ijpn.2000.6.2.8946
PMID:11035625
Abstract

Palliative care professionals have begun to address the issues surrounding the provision of palliative care to non-cancer patients. Yet the situation remains inconsistent and morally unjustifiable. The duty to provide care, non-maleficence, beneficence, protecting the patient's best interests and respecting patient autonomy are key responsibilities which palliative care professionals have for all their patients, regardless of their diagnosis. On the grounds of justice as fairness, equality and equity, the current inconsistencies in the provision of palliative care to non-cancer patients are unfair unequal and inequitable. Professionals can no longer ignore their moral responsibility to address these issues and change their practice to include the provision of care for dying patients regardless of their diagnoses.

摘要

姑息治疗专业人员已开始着手解决围绕向非癌症患者提供姑息治疗的相关问题。然而,情况仍然不一致且在道德上站不住脚。提供护理的责任、不伤害原则、行善原则、保护患者的最大利益以及尊重患者自主权,是姑息治疗专业人员对所有患者应尽的关键责任,无论其诊断结果如何。基于公平、平等和公正的原则,目前在向非癌症患者提供姑息治疗方面存在的不一致情况是不公平、不平等且不公正的。专业人员再也不能忽视解决这些问题的道德责任,不能再忽视改变其做法以将为临终患者提供护理纳入其中,无论这些患者的诊断结果是什么。

相似文献

1
Ethical arguments for providing palliative care to non-cancer patients.为非癌症患者提供姑息治疗的伦理依据。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2000 Feb;6(2):66-70. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2000.6.2.8946.
2
Inequity in the provision of and access to palliative care for cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC).癌症患者姑息治疗提供与可及性方面的不平等。意大利癌症临终调查(ISDOC)结果
BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 27;7:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-66.
3
Community health nurses. Their most significant ethical decision-making problems.社区健康护士。他们最重大的伦理决策问题。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;24(4):967-75.
4
Access to hospice. Ethical dimensions.临终关怀的可及性。伦理层面。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1985 Jun;20(2):299-309.
5
Palliative care, public health and justice: setting priorities in resource poor countries.姑息治疗、公共卫生与正义:资源匮乏国家的资源分配优先事项。
Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(3):105-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00264.x. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
6
Pain management. Theological and ethical principles governing the use of pain relief for dying patients. Task Force on Pain Management, Catholic Health Association.疼痛管理。指导为临终患者缓解疼痛的神学和伦理原则。天主教健康协会疼痛管理特别工作组。
Health Prog. 1993 Jan-Feb;74(1):30-9, 65.
7
Ethical issues in caring for the patient with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者护理中的伦理问题。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;24(4):977-86.
8
Ethical issues in surgical palliative care: am I killing the patient by "letting him go"?外科姑息治疗中的伦理问题:我“让患者离去”是在杀害患者吗?
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Apr;85(2):273-86, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.11.006.
9
Palliative philosophy: the ethical underpinning.姑息治疗理念:伦理基础
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001 Jan;10(1):31-8.
10
Resource allocation decisions in critical care nursing.重症护理中的资源分配决策
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;24(4):1009-15.