Aziz I, Wilson A M, Lipworth B J
Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1049-58. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1049.
We wished to evaluate the effects of once-daily combination therapy on surrogate inflammatory markers.
Fifteen patients with atopic persistent asthma were evaluated (mean age, 32.4 years; FEV(1), 75.2% predicted) in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study with a 1-week placebo washout period, comparing the following once-daily nighttime treatments: (1) formoterol (FM), 12 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, for 2 weeks; or (2) budesonide (BUD), 400 microg, for 2 weeks and BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks; or (3) FM, 12 microg, plus BUD, 400 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, plus BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated at 12 h postdosing after administration of each placebo and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment.
The results of AMP challenge (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) at 4 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements after patients had received all active treatments compared to placebo (20 mg/mL), with FM plus BUD, 261 mg/mL, being superior (p<0.05) to FM alone, 82 mg/mL, but not to BUD, 201 mg/mL. NO and ECP showed significant (p<0.05) reductions compared to placebo with FM plus BUD or BUD alone but not with FM alone. Combination therapy was associated with optimal patient preference (rank order, FM plus BUD > FM > BUD; p<0.0005), highest domiciliary peak expiratory flow, and lowest rescue inhaler usage. All three treatments produced equivalent improvements in spirometry.
Patients preferred once-daily combination therapy, but this had no greater effect on inflammatory markers than therapy with BUD alone. FM alone had no anti-inflammatory activity but exhibited bronchoprotection. This emphasizes the importance of first optimizing anti-inflammatory control with inhaled corticosteroids before considering adding a regular long-acting beta(2)-agonist.
我们希望评估每日一次联合治疗对替代炎症标志物的影响。
在一项随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照的交叉研究中,对15例特应性持续性哮喘患者(平均年龄32.4岁;第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV(1)]为预测值的75.2%)进行了评估,该研究有1周的安慰剂洗脱期,比较以下每日一次的夜间治疗方案:(1)福莫特罗(FM),12微克,持续2周,然后FM,24微克,持续2周;或(2)布地奈德(BUD),400微克,持续2周,然后BUD,800微克,持续2周;或(3)FM,12微克加BUD,400微克,持续2周,然后FM,24微克加BUD,800微克,持续2周。在每次安慰剂给药后以及每种治疗的第2周和第4周给药后第12小时,评估单磷酸腺苷(AMP)支气管激发试验、呼出一氧化氮(NO)和血清嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)。
4周时AMP激发试验(导致FEV(1)下降20%的激发浓度)结果显示,与安慰剂(20毫克/毫升)相比,患者接受所有活性治疗后有显著(p<0.05)改善,FM加BUD组为261毫克/毫升,优于单独使用FM组的82毫克/毫升(p<0.05),但不如BUD组的201毫克/毫升。与安慰剂相比,FM加BUD或单独使用BUD时,NO和ECP有显著(p<0.05)降低,但单独使用FM时无此现象。联合治疗与患者的最佳偏好相关(排序为FM加BUD>FM>BUD;p<0.0005),家庭最高呼气峰流速,以及最低的急救吸入器使用量。所有三种治疗在肺功能测定方面产生了同等程度的改善。
患者更喜欢每日一次的联合治疗,但这对炎症标志物的影响并不比单独使用BUD治疗更大。单独使用FM没有抗炎活性,但具有支气管保护作用。这强调了在考虑添加常规长效β(2)受体激动剂之前,先用吸入性糖皮质激素优化抗炎控制的重要性。