Suppr超能文献

每日一次单独或联合使用福莫特罗和布地奈德对成年哮喘患者替代炎症标志物的影响。

Effects of once-daily formoterol and budesonide given alone or in combination on surrogate inflammatory markers in asthmatic adults.

作者信息

Aziz I, Wilson A M, Lipworth B J

机构信息

Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1049-58. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1049.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We wished to evaluate the effects of once-daily combination therapy on surrogate inflammatory markers.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with atopic persistent asthma were evaluated (mean age, 32.4 years; FEV(1), 75.2% predicted) in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study with a 1-week placebo washout period, comparing the following once-daily nighttime treatments: (1) formoterol (FM), 12 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, for 2 weeks; or (2) budesonide (BUD), 400 microg, for 2 weeks and BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks; or (3) FM, 12 microg, plus BUD, 400 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, plus BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated at 12 h postdosing after administration of each placebo and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment.

RESULTS

The results of AMP challenge (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) at 4 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements after patients had received all active treatments compared to placebo (20 mg/mL), with FM plus BUD, 261 mg/mL, being superior (p<0.05) to FM alone, 82 mg/mL, but not to BUD, 201 mg/mL. NO and ECP showed significant (p<0.05) reductions compared to placebo with FM plus BUD or BUD alone but not with FM alone. Combination therapy was associated with optimal patient preference (rank order, FM plus BUD > FM > BUD; p<0.0005), highest domiciliary peak expiratory flow, and lowest rescue inhaler usage. All three treatments produced equivalent improvements in spirometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients preferred once-daily combination therapy, but this had no greater effect on inflammatory markers than therapy with BUD alone. FM alone had no anti-inflammatory activity but exhibited bronchoprotection. This emphasizes the importance of first optimizing anti-inflammatory control with inhaled corticosteroids before considering adding a regular long-acting beta(2)-agonist.

摘要

目的

我们希望评估每日一次联合治疗对替代炎症标志物的影响。

方法

在一项随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照的交叉研究中,对15例特应性持续性哮喘患者(平均年龄32.4岁;第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV(1)]为预测值的75.2%)进行了评估,该研究有1周的安慰剂洗脱期,比较以下每日一次的夜间治疗方案:(1)福莫特罗(FM),12微克,持续2周,然后FM,24微克,持续2周;或(2)布地奈德(BUD),400微克,持续2周,然后BUD,800微克,持续2周;或(3)FM,12微克加BUD,400微克,持续2周,然后FM,24微克加BUD,800微克,持续2周。在每次安慰剂给药后以及每种治疗的第2周和第4周给药后第12小时,评估单磷酸腺苷(AMP)支气管激发试验、呼出一氧化氮(NO)和血清嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)。

结果

4周时AMP激发试验(导致FEV(1)下降20%的激发浓度)结果显示,与安慰剂(20毫克/毫升)相比,患者接受所有活性治疗后有显著(p<0.05)改善,FM加BUD组为261毫克/毫升,优于单独使用FM组的82毫克/毫升(p<0.05),但不如BUD组的201毫克/毫升。与安慰剂相比,FM加BUD或单独使用BUD时,NO和ECP有显著(p<0.05)降低,但单独使用FM时无此现象。联合治疗与患者的最佳偏好相关(排序为FM加BUD>FM>BUD;p<0.0005),家庭最高呼气峰流速,以及最低的急救吸入器使用量。所有三种治疗在肺功能测定方面产生了同等程度的改善。

结论

患者更喜欢每日一次的联合治疗,但这对炎症标志物的影响并不比单独使用BUD治疗更大。单独使用FM没有抗炎活性,但具有支气管保护作用。这强调了在考虑添加常规长效β(2)受体激动剂之前,先用吸入性糖皮质激素优化抗炎控制的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验