• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹主动脉瘤的最佳间隔期筛查与监测

Optimal interval screening and surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Lindholt J S, Vammen S, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg E W

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Viborg Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Oct;20(4):369-73. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1191.

DOI:10.1053/ejvs.2000.1191
PMID:11035969
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to determine safe and optimal intervals of rescreening and surveillance for AAA.

METHODS

hospital-based mass screening of 6339 65-73-year-old men from 1994-98. 76.4% attended. One hundred and ninety-one (4%) had AAA53 cm. Twenty-four (0.5%) were initially >5 cm and referred for surgery, while the rest were offered annual control scans to check for expansion. Later, all 348 (7.5%) men who 3 to 5 years ago had an ectatic aorta (infrarenal aortic diameter of 25-29 mm or distal/renal aortic diameter ratio >1.2) were offered rescreening. Of these, 62 (18%) died before rescanning, while 248 of the survivors attended rescreening (87%). Furthermore, a random sample of 380 of those with non-ectatic aortas were offered rescreening. Of these, 49 (13%) died before rescreening (p=0.06), while 275 (83%) of the survivors attended re-screening.

RESULTS

none of the controls had developed AAA. Of those who initially had an 25-29 mm aorta, 29% had developed AAA (size range 30-48 mm) with expansion rates varying from 1.0 to 4.7 mm/year. Only 3.5% with a ratio >1.2 developed AAA (size range: 30-34 mm) with expansion rates from 1.3 to 2.4 mm/year. During the fourth year of surveillance some AAA initially sized below 3.5 cm expanded to above 5 cm, while some sized 3.5-3.9 cm did so during the second year, >4 cm did so during the first year of surveillance.

CONCLUSION

rescreening for AAA can be restricted to initially ectatic aortas sized 25-29 mm at 5-year intervals. Surveillance of small AAA can be restricted to 1-4 year intervals.

摘要

目的

确定腹主动脉瘤再次筛查和监测的安全及最佳间隔时间。

方法

1994年至1998年对6339名65至73岁男性进行基于医院的大规模筛查。76.4%的人参加了筛查。191人(4%)患有腹主动脉瘤,其中53人瘤体直径≥5cm。24人(0.5%)最初瘤体直径>5cm,被转诊接受手术,其余患者则接受年度对照扫描以检查瘤体是否扩大。后来,对所有348名(7.5%)在3至5年前有主动脉扩张(肾下主动脉直径为25至29mm或远端/肾主动脉直径比>1.2) 的男性进行再次筛查。其中,62人(18%)在再次筛查前死亡,而248名幸存者参加了再次筛查(87%)。此外,对380名非扩张性主动脉的男性进行随机抽样并提供再次筛查。其中,49人(13%)在再次筛查前死亡(p=0.06),而275名幸存者参加了再次筛查(83%)。

结果

对照组中无人发生腹主动脉瘤。最初主动脉直径为25至29mm的患者中,29%发生了腹主动脉瘤(瘤体大小范围为30至48mm),扩张率为每年1.0至4.7mm。只有3.5%的直径比>1.2的患者发生了腹主动脉瘤(瘤体大小范围为30至34mm),扩张率为每年1.3至2.4mm。在监测的第四年,一些最初大小<3.5cm的腹主动脉瘤扩大到>5cm,而一些大小为3.5至3.9cm的腹主动脉瘤在第二年扩大到>5cm,>4cm的腹主动脉瘤在监测的第一年扩大到>5cm。

结论

腹主动脉瘤的再次筛查可限于最初直径为25至29mm的扩张性主动脉,间隔5年进行一次。小型腹主动脉瘤的监测间隔可限于1至4年。

相似文献

1
Optimal interval screening and surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤的最佳间隔期筛查与监测
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Oct;20(4):369-73. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1191.
2
[Optimal interval screening and observation of abdominal aortic aneurysms].[腹主动脉瘤的最佳间隔期筛查与观察]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 Sep 10;163(37):5034-7.
3
Assessment of the criteria for elective surgery in screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysms.筛查发现的腹主动脉瘤择期手术标准的评估。
J Med Screen. 2005;12(3):150-4. doi: 10.1258/0969141054855247.
4
Recommendations for screening intervals for small aortic aneurysms.小主动脉瘤筛查间隔的建议。
Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):821-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4216.
5
[Surgery of abdominal aorta with horseshoe kidney].马蹄肾腹主动脉手术
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):36-44.
6
[Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Results from a randomized screening trial].[腹主动脉瘤筛查的医院成本与效益。一项随机筛查试验的结果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Feb 3;165(6):579-83.
7
The incidence of small abdominal aortic aneurysms and the change in normal infrarenal aortic diameter: implications for screening.小腹主动脉瘤的发病率及肾下腹主动脉正常直径的变化:对筛查的意义
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Feb;21(2):165-70. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1285.
8
[Reduction of the expansion rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms with roxithromycin. Results from a randomized controlled trial].[罗红霉素降低小腹主动脉瘤扩张率。一项随机对照试验的结果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Dec 9;164(50):5916-9.
9
Preliminary ten year results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm.一项针对腹主动脉瘤的随机单中心大规模筛查试验的初步十年结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Dec;32(6):608-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.06.008. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
10
High-risk and low-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm both reduce aneurysm-related mortality. A stratified analysis from a single-centre randomised screening trial.腹主动脉瘤的高风险和低风险筛查均能降低与动脉瘤相关的死亡率。一项单中心随机筛查试验的分层分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jul;34(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.12.031. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter and its risk factors: a retrospective cohort study.腹主动脉瘤直径与其危险因素之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Vasc Bras. 2025 Feb 14;24:e20230110. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202301102. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of large proximal aortic neck on endovascular aneurysm repair outcomes.近端主动脉颈部较大对血管内动脉瘤修复结果的影响。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2023 Oct 19;31(4):489-497. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2023.25255. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Investigation of commonly used aortic aneurysm growth rate metrics: Comparing their suitability for clinical and research applications.
常用主动脉瘤生长率指标的研究:比较其在临床和研究应用中的适用性。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0289078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289078. eCollection 2023.
4
Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor to Stimulate Elastic Matrix Regenerative Repair.针对表皮生长因子受体刺激弹性基质再生修复。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2023 Apr;29(7-8):187-199. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2022.0170. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Point-of-Care Abdominal Ultrasonography (POCUS) on the Way to the Right and Rapid Diagnosis.即时护理腹部超声检查(POCUS)迈向正确快速诊断之路。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;12(9):2052. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092052.
6
AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis.腹主动脉瘤再探讨:危险因素、管理及发病机制特征的综合综述
Biomedicines. 2022 Jan 2;10(1):94. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094.
7
Growth prediction model for abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤生长预测模型。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):211-219. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab407.
8
Identification of a Plasma Microrna Signature as Biomarker of Subaneurysmal Aortic Dilation in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.鉴定血浆微小RNA特征作为高心血管风险患者主动脉瘤样扩张的生物标志物
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 28;9(9):2783. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092783.
9
Gender differences of morphological and hemodynamic characteristics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤形态学和血流动力学特征的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Jul 21;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13293-020-00318-3.
10
Prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms epidemic in general population--a meta-analysis.一般人群中腹主动脉瘤流行的患病率和趋势——一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 2;8(12):e81260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081260. eCollection 2013.