Suppr超能文献

1900年美国心理学的科学地位。

The scientific status of American psychology in 1900.

作者信息

Tweney R D, Budzynski C A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, OH 43403, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2000 Sep;55(9):1014-7.

Abstract

In 1900, psychologists were attempting to define themselves and searching for their role among both academic and non-academic public. The success of experimental methods served to advance their position as exemplary scientists, although, as the authors argue in this article, other factors were also important. First, the issue of measurement involved many disagreements about the tools needed to measure psychological constructs or even whether psychologists should measure anything at all. Second, the relationship between the brain and psychological constructs enhanced psychology's status for some, whereas others felt that psychologists should stay away from such topics. Parallels with present-day concerns among psychologists are addressed at the end of the article.

摘要

1900年,心理学家们试图界定自身,并在学术界和非学术界寻找自己的角色。实验方法的成功有助于提升他们作为模范科学家的地位,不过,正如本文作者所指出的,其他因素也很重要。首先,测量问题涉及许多分歧,包括测量心理结构所需的工具,甚至心理学家是否根本就应该进行测量。其次,大脑与心理结构之间的关系提升了心理学在一些人眼中的地位,而另一些人则认为心理学家应该远离这类话题。本文结尾探讨了与当今心理学家所关注问题的相似之处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验