Suppr超能文献

1900年美国心理学的科学地位。

The scientific status of American psychology in 1900.

作者信息

Tweney R D, Budzynski C A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, OH 43403, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2000 Sep;55(9):1014-7.

Abstract

In 1900, psychologists were attempting to define themselves and searching for their role among both academic and non-academic public. The success of experimental methods served to advance their position as exemplary scientists, although, as the authors argue in this article, other factors were also important. First, the issue of measurement involved many disagreements about the tools needed to measure psychological constructs or even whether psychologists should measure anything at all. Second, the relationship between the brain and psychological constructs enhanced psychology's status for some, whereas others felt that psychologists should stay away from such topics. Parallels with present-day concerns among psychologists are addressed at the end of the article.

摘要

1900年,心理学家们试图界定自身,并在学术界和非学术界寻找自己的角色。实验方法的成功有助于提升他们作为模范科学家的地位,不过,正如本文作者所指出的,其他因素也很重要。首先,测量问题涉及许多分歧,包括测量心理结构所需的工具,甚至心理学家是否根本就应该进行测量。其次,大脑与心理结构之间的关系提升了心理学在一些人眼中的地位,而另一些人则认为心理学家应该远离这类话题。本文结尾探讨了与当今心理学家所关注问题的相似之处。

相似文献

5
American psychology and the religious imagination.美国心理学与宗教想象力。
J Hist Behav Sci. 2006 Summer;42(3):221-35. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20170.
7
8
[Latin American psychology: a two-way start].
Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1995 Dec;41(4):322-5.
9
Wundt contested: The first crisis declaration in psychology.冯特反驳道:心理学中的首个危机宣言。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Jun;43(2):434-44. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验