• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学史出版物的科学计量趋势分析:心理学正在成为一门非历史学科吗?

Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?

作者信息

Krampen Günter

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID), 54286 Trier, Germany ; Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany ; Department of Psychology (INSIDE), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2016;106:1217-1238. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4
PMID:26924864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4757634/
Abstract

Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and PsycINFO. Declines of publications on the history of psychology are described scientometrically for both research communities since the 1990s. Some impulses are suggested for the future of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology. These include (1) the necessity and significance of an intensified use of quantitative, unobtrusive scientometric methods in historiography in times of digital "big data", (2) the necessity and possibilities to integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies in historical research and teaching, (3) the reasonableness of interdisciplinary cooperation of specialist historians, scientometricians, and psychologists, (4) the meaningfulness and necessity to explore, investigate, and teach more intensively the past and the problem history of psychology as well as the understanding of the subject matter of psychology in its historical development in cultural contexts. The outlook on the future of such a more up-to-date research on and teaching of the history of psychology is-with some caution-positive.

摘要

通过心理学数据库PSYNDEX和PsycINFO,从科学计量学角度审视了德语国家心理学史研究及教学的趋势和现状,并将研究结果与其他国家(主要是美国)的情况进行了比较。自20世纪90年代以来,科学计量学描述了两个研究群体中关于心理学史出版物数量的下降情况。针对心理学史研究和教学的未来发展提出了一些建议。这些建议包括:(1)在数字“大数据”时代,在史学研究中加强使用定量、非侵入性科学计量方法的必要性和重要性;(2)在历史研究和教学中整合定性和定量方法的必要性和可能性;(3)专业历史学家、科学计量学家和心理学家进行跨学科合作的合理性;(4)更深入地探索、研究和讲授心理学的过去、问题史以及在文化背景下其历史发展中对心理学主题的理解的意义和必要性。对这种更新颖的心理学史研究和教学的未来展望——需谨慎对待——是积极的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c992/4757634/f29ec55e8277/11192_2016_1834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c992/4757634/d9a603feb2a5/11192_2016_1834_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c992/4757634/f29ec55e8277/11192_2016_1834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c992/4757634/d9a603feb2a5/11192_2016_1834_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c992/4757634/f29ec55e8277/11192_2016_1834_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?心理学史出版物的科学计量趋势分析:心理学正在成为一门非历史学科吗?
Scientometrics. 2016;106:1217-1238. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
2
Citation success of different publication types: a case study on all references in psychology publications from the German-speaking countries (D-A-CH-L-L) in 2009, 2010, and 2011.不同出版物类型的被引成功率:以2009年、2010年和2011年德语国家(德国、奥地利、瑞士、列支敦士登)心理学出版物中的所有参考文献为例的研究。
Scientometrics. 2015;104(3):827-840. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1573-y. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
3
The history specialist in psychology: From avocation to professionalization.心理学领域的历史专家:从业余爱好到专业化。
Hist Psychol. 2016 Aug;19(3):192-208. doi: 10.1037/hop0000027.
4
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
5
History's mysteries demystified: becoming a psychologist-historian.揭开历史谜团:成为一名心理学史学家。
Am J Psychol. 2009 Spring;122(1):117-29.
6
Pluralism and heterogeneity as criticism: Undergraduate history and systems of psychology courses in Argentinian psychology education (1983-2017).作为批判的多元主义与异质性:阿根廷心理学教育中的本科心理学史与心理学体系课程(1983 - 2017)
Hist Psychol. 2018 May;21(2):126-150. doi: 10.1037/hop0000085. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
7
A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications on Cultural-Historical Psychology from 2010 to 2020: Dynamics, Geography, and Key Ideas.2010年至2020年文化历史心理学科学出版物的文献计量分析:动态、地理分布和关键思想
Psychol Russ. 2022 Dec 30;15(4):188-214. doi: 10.11621/pir.2022.0412. eCollection 2022.
8
The future of the history of psychology in Argentina and Brazil.阿根廷和巴西心理学史的未来。
Hist Psychol. 2016 Aug;19(3):229-247. doi: 10.1037/hop0000030.
9
Rotavirus - Global research density equalizing mapping and gender analysis.轮状病毒 - 全球研究密度均衡映射与性别分析
Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
10
Digital methods for the history of psychology: Introduction and resources.心理学史的数字方法:引言与资源
Hist Psychol. 2016 Feb;19(1):72-75. doi: 10.1037/h0101509.

引用本文的文献

1
To Have the Best Interest at Heart: Analyzing the Match Between Laypersons' Interests and Publication Activity in Psychology.心怀最大利益:剖析外行人的利益与心理学领域出版活动之间的匹配度
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;13:899430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899430. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
2
Searching for the structure of early American psychology: Networking Psychological Review, 1909-1923.探寻早期美国心理学的结构:《心理学评论》网络版,1909 - 1923年
Hist Psychol. 2015 May;18(2):196-204. doi: 10.1037/a0039013.
3
Beyond the schools of psychology 2: a digital analysis of psychological review, 1904-1923.超越心理学流派2:1904 - 1923年《心理学评论》的数字分析
J Hist Behav Sci. 2014 Summer;50(3):249-79. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21665. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
4
Beyond the schools of psychology 1: a digital analysis of Psychological Review, 1894-1903.超越心理学流派1:对《心理学评论》(1894 - 1903年)的数字化分析
J Hist Behav Sci. 2013 Spring;49(2):167-89. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21592. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
5
Genius [corrected] without the "Great Man": new possibilities for the historian of psychology.没有“伟人”的天才[修正版]:心理学史家面临的新机遇
Hist Psychol. 2012 Feb;15(1):72-83. doi: 10.1037/a0023247.
6
Historiography of psychology in Spain: the last decade.
Hist Psychol. 2010 Aug;13(3):277-308. doi: 10.1037/a0020354.
7
The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American.被忽视的95%:为何美国心理学需要减少美国化。
Am Psychol. 2008 Oct;63(7):602-14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602.
8
Bringing history to life: simulating landmark experiments in psychology.重现历史:模拟心理学中的里程碑式实验。
Hist Psychol. 2006 May;9(2):113-43. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.9.2.113.
9
Constructing knowledge. The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology.构建知识。图表在硬心理学和软心理学中的作用。
Am Psychol. 2002 Oct;57(10):749-761. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.10.749.
10
The scientific status of American psychology in 1900.1900年美国心理学的科学地位。
Am Psychol. 2000 Sep;55(9):1014-7.