Suppr超能文献

中风护理的替代策略:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, Knapp M, Donaldson N, Swift C G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Guy's, King's and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2000 Sep 9;356(9233):894-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02679-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organised specialist care for stroke improves outcome, but the merits of different methods of organisation are in doubt. This study compares the efficacy of stroke unit with stroke team or domiciliary care.

METHODS

A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial was undertaken in 457 acute-stroke patients (average age 76 years, 48% women) randomly assigned to stroke unit, general wards with stroke team support, or domiciliary stroke care, within 72 h of stroke onset. Outcome was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure was death or institutionalisation at 12 months. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

152 patients were allocated to the stroke unit, 152 to stroke team, and 153 to domiciliary stroke care. 51 (34%) patients in the domiciliary group were admitted to hospital after randomisation. Mortality or institutionalisation at 1 year were lower in patients on a stroke unit than for those receiving care from a stroke team (21/152 [14%] vs 45/149 [30%]; p<0.001) or domiciliary care (21/152 [14%] vs 34/144 [24%]; p=0.03), mainly as a result of reduction in mortality. The proportion of patients alive without severe disability at 1 year was also significantly higher on the stroke unit compared with stroke team (129/152 [85%] vs 99/149 [66%]; p<0.001) or domiciliary care (129/152 [85%] vs 102/144 [71%]; p=0.002). These differences were present at 3 and 6 months after stroke.

INTERPRETATION

Stroke units are more effective than a specialist stroke team or specialist domiciliary care in reducing mortality, institutionalisation, and dependence after stroke.

摘要

背景

卒中的专科组织化护理可改善预后,但不同组织方式的优势尚不确定。本研究比较了卒中单元与卒中团队或家庭护理的疗效。

方法

对457例急性卒中患者(平均年龄76岁,48%为女性)进行了一项单盲、随机对照试验,这些患者在卒中发作72小时内被随机分配至卒中单元、有卒中团队支持的普通病房或家庭卒中护理组。在3个月、6个月和12个月时评估预后。主要结局指标为12个月时的死亡或入住机构。分析采用意向性治疗。

结果

152例患者被分配至卒中单元,152例至卒中团队,153例至家庭卒中护理组。家庭护理组中有51例(34%)患者在随机分组后入院。卒中单元患者1年时的死亡率或入住机构率低于接受卒中团队护理的患者(21/152 [14%] 对比45/149 [30%];p<0.001)或家庭护理患者(21/152 [14%] 对比34/144 [24%];p=0.03),主要是由于死亡率降低。与卒中团队(129/152 [85%] 对比99/149 [66%];p<0.001)或家庭护理(129/152 [85%] 对比102/144 [71%];p=0.002)相比,卒中单元1年时存活且无严重残疾的患者比例也显著更高。这些差异在卒中后3个月和6个月时就已存在。

解读

卒中单元在降低卒中后的死亡率、入住机构率和依赖程度方面比专科卒中团队或专科家庭护理更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验