Mon-Williams M, McIntosh R D
School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Sep;134(2):268-73. doi: 10.1007/s002210000479.
We used an obstacle avoidance task to test two opposing accounts of how the nervous system controls prehension. The visuomotor account supposes that the system independently controls the grip formation and transport phase of prehensile movements. In contrast, the digit channel hypothesis suggests that the system controls the thumb and finger more or less independently. Our data strongly favoured the traditional visuomotor channel hypothesis and demonstrated that the time taken to grasp an object in the presence of obstacles was well predicted by a Fitts' law relationship. We suggest a "thirdway" hypothesis in order to retain the advantages of the digit channel hypothesis within the visuomotor framework. The third-way hypothesis suggests that the nervous system selects a single digit to transport to the object. We speculate that the actual digit selected might depend upon attention and the nature of the prehension task. This hypothesis is able to account for most of the empirical findings unearthed by researchers investigating the control of prehension.
我们使用了一项避障任务来测试关于神经系统如何控制抓握的两种对立观点。视觉运动观点认为,该系统独立控制抓握动作的握形和运输阶段。相比之下,手指通道假说表明,该系统或多或少独立地控制拇指和手指。我们的数据强烈支持传统的视觉运动通道假说,并表明在有障碍物的情况下抓取物体所需的时间可以通过菲茨定律关系得到很好的预测。我们提出了一个“第三条途径”假说,以便在视觉运动框架内保留手指通道假说的优点。第三条途径假说表明,神经系统选择单个手指向物体移动。我们推测实际选择的手指可能取决于注意力和抓握任务的性质。这一假说能够解释研究抓握控制的研究人员发掘出的大多数实证结果。