• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜手术——基于证据?]

[Laparoscopic surgery--evidence-based ?].

作者信息

Ekelund G, Edlund G, Smedberg S, Rudberg C, Johnsson F

机构信息

Kirurgiska kliniken, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Malmö.

出版信息

Lakartidningen. 2000 Aug 9;97(32-33):3457-62.

PMID:11037586
Abstract

The literature has been searched for current results in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hernia repair, appendectomy and fundoplication. This was performed as a systematic review. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was judged to be safe and cost/effective, with good patient acceptability. However a need for further studies is indicated. Laparoscopic technique in hernia repair has a longer learning curve and is more expensive than open repair, with no major difference in recurrence rates. It is preferable in bilateral repairs. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the hands of experienced surgeons is cost/effective. Time to recovery is shorter and the rate of infectious complications is lower than in conventional procedures. There are still too few results reported from laparoscopic fundoplication to permit reliable conclusions.

摘要

我们检索了有关腹腔镜胆囊切除术、疝修补术、阑尾切除术和胃底折叠术的最新研究结果。这是一项系统评价。腹腔镜胆囊切除术被认为是安全且具有成本效益的,患者接受度良好。然而,仍表明需要进一步研究。腹腔镜疝修补术的学习曲线较长,且比开放手术更昂贵,复发率没有显著差异。双侧修补时更适合采用腹腔镜手术。在经验丰富的外科医生手中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有成本效益。恢复时间更短,感染并发症发生率低于传统手术。腹腔镜胃底折叠术的报告结果仍然太少,无法得出可靠结论。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic surgery--evidence-based ?].[腹腔镜手术——基于证据?]
Lakartidningen. 2000 Aug 9;97(32-33):3457-62.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
4
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
5
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
6
Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication.抗反流胃底折叠术的循证评估
Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):325-37. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114225.46280.fe.
7
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
8
Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.开放式补片与非补片用于股疝和腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD002197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002197.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Laparoscopic appendectomy as the gold standard: What role remains for open surgery, conversion, and disease severity? : An analysis of 32,000 cases with appendicitis in Germany.腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为金标准:开放手术、中转手术及疾病严重程度还发挥着什么作用?:对德国32000例阑尾炎病例的分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 18;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00626-2.