Suppr超能文献

比较急性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术与择期胆囊切除术的对照临床试验。

Controlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

McArthur P, Cuschieri A, Sells R A, Shields R

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1975 Oct;62(10):850-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621025.

Abstract

The traditional management of acute cholecystitis is initial conservative treatment with antibiotics followed by elective cholecystectomy. Although early cholecystectomy has often been advocated, there has been only one randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the two methods of treatment. This paper reports the preliminary results of such a trial in which 32 patients have been studied so far. Of the 17 patients managed conservatively, there was a misdiagnosis in 2 (11-8 per cent). In the remaining 15 patients with acute cholecystitis 3 (20 per cent) required urgent operation because of failure of medical treatment. Elective cholecystectomy was not technically difficult. Of the 15 patients treated by early cholecystectomy, there was a misdiagnosis in 1 (6-8 per cent). Surgery was technically difficult in 2 patients but cholecystectomy was possible in all. The former 2 patients required blood transfusion, but in the remainder the estimated blood loss was only slightly more than in the elective group. There was no mortality in either group nor any complication directly attributable to the biliary surgery. The incidence of minor postoperative complications was only slightly greater in those treated by early operation. The length of postoperative stay was similar in both groups but those treated conservatively spent an average of 11 more days in hospital. The preliminary results indicate that those treated by early cholecystectomy spend less time in hospital and avoid the complications of failed conservative treatment without the added risk of increased postoperative mortality and major complications.

摘要

急性胆囊炎的传统治疗方法是先用抗生素进行初始保守治疗,随后择期行胆囊切除术。尽管早期胆囊切除术常常受到提倡,但仅有一项比较这两种治疗方法的随机对照临床试验。本文报告了该项试验的初步结果,到目前为止已对32例患者进行了研究。在17例接受保守治疗的患者中,有2例(11.8%)被误诊。在其余15例急性胆囊炎患者中,3例(20%)因药物治疗失败而需要紧急手术。择期胆囊切除术在技术上并不困难。在15例接受早期胆囊切除术的患者中,有1例(6.8%)被误诊。2例患者手术操作困难,但所有患者均可行胆囊切除术。前2例患者需要输血,而其余患者估计失血量仅比择期手术组略多。两组均无死亡病例及任何直接归因于胆道手术的并发症。早期手术治疗患者术后轻微并发症的发生率仅略高。两组术后住院时间相似,但保守治疗患者平均多住院11天。初步结果表明,早期胆囊切除术治疗的患者住院时间较短,避免了保守治疗失败的并发症,且无术后死亡率增加和严重并发症的额外风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验