• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胆囊炎的急诊与择期胆囊切除术

Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

Misra M C, Khanna S, Khosla A, Berry M, Kapur B M

机构信息

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

Jpn J Surg. 1988 Jul;18(4):384-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02471461.

DOI:10.1007/BF02471461
PMID:3050215
Abstract

The present study was carried out at the Department of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, New Delhi, between January 1982 and October 1984. Clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was confirmed by ultrasound scanning or Tc99m labelled HIDA Scan. Group I (n=24) comprised patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy while Group II (n=23) comprised patients who were managed conservatively, and had an elective cholecystectomy performed 6-12 weeks later. There was no mortality or wound infection in either group. The incidence of other complications was 8.3 per cent and 8.6 per cent in Groups I and II, respectively. Emergency cholecystectomy (Group I) reduced the total hospital stay of a patient by approximately 70 per cent and post cholecystectomy syndrome was seen in Group II patients only. We thus recommend emergency or early cholecystectomy during the acute stage of cholecystitis, as it is safe, effective and economical, provided it is done by an experienced surgeon.

摘要

本研究于1982年1月至1984年10月在新德里全印度医学科学研究所医院外科进行。急性胆囊炎的临床诊断通过超声扫描或锝99m标记的HIDA扫描得以证实。第一组(n = 24)包括接受急诊胆囊切除术的患者,而第二组(n = 23)包括接受保守治疗的患者,并在6 - 12周后进行择期胆囊切除术。两组均无死亡或伤口感染情况。第一组和第二组其他并发症的发生率分别为8.3%和8.6%。急诊胆囊切除术(第一组)使患者的总住院时间减少了约70%,且仅在第二组患者中出现了胆囊切除术后综合征。因此,我们建议在胆囊炎急性期进行急诊或早期胆囊切除术,因为只要由经验丰富的外科医生进行操作,该手术就是安全、有效且经济的。

相似文献

1
Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的急诊与择期胆囊切除术
Jpn J Surg. 1988 Jul;18(4):384-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02471461.
2
[Early vs delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].[急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟胆囊切除术]
Harefuah. 1991 Mar 15;120(6):319-23.
3
Comparison of Emergency Cholecystectomy with Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage in Patients with Moderate Acute Cholecystitis.中度急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术后急诊胆囊切除术与延期胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):705-712. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0502. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: sensitivity of sonography, cholescintigraphy, and combined sonography-cholescintigraphy.急性胆囊炎的诊断:超声检查、胆囊闪烁造影术及超声-胆囊闪烁造影术联合检查的敏感性
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Dec;193(6):609-13. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01092-4.
5
Acute cholecystitis--room for improvement?急性胆囊炎——还有改进的空间吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):10-3.
6
Controlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.比较急性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术与择期胆囊切除术的对照临床试验。
Br J Surg. 1975 Oct;62(10):850-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621025.
7
Urgent and early cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease.急性胆囊疾病的紧急早期胆囊切除术
Br J Surg. 1988 Feb;75(2):141-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750217.
8
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis].
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1996;155(3):28-30.
9
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous echo-guided cholecystostomy. Their applications in acute cholecystitis].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮超声引导下胆囊造瘘术。它们在急性胆囊炎中的应用]
Ann Ital Chir. 1993 Mar-Apr;64(2):219-24.
10
Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis with subtotal cholecystectomy.腹腔镜下胆囊次全切除术治疗急性胆囊炎
Am Surg. 1998 Oct;64(10):955-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-cholecystectomy syndrome: A new look at an old problem.胆囊切除术后综合征:对一个老问题的新审视。
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jul-Sep;14(3):202-207. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_92_17.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:适应证、技术、风险及结局
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Sep;390(5):373-80. doi: 10.1007/s00423-004-0509-4. Epub 2004 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Early versus delayed cholecystectomy: the effect of a change in management.早期与延迟胆囊切除术:管理方式改变的影响。
Br J Surg. 1981 Nov;68(11):753-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800681102.
2
Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study.急性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Surg. 1980 Apr;191(4):501-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198004000-00018.
3
Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial.急性胆囊炎的早期或延迟胆囊切除术?一项临床试验。
Br J Surg. 1983 Mar;70(3):163-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700309.
4
The management of acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的管理
Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Oct;53(5):1071-7. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)40136-2.
5
Ultrasonography, HIDA scintigraphy or both in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis?超声检查、肝胆动态显像或两者联合用于急性胆囊炎的诊断?
Br J Surg. 1985 Apr;72(4):267-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720406.
6
Ultrasonography in acute upper abdomen.急性上腹部的超声检查
Australas Radiol. 1987 Feb;31(1):62-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1987.tb01785.x.
7
Acute cholecystitis treated by early and delayed surgery. A controlled clinical trial.早期与延期手术治疗急性胆囊炎:一项对照临床试验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1978;13(6):673-8. doi: 10.3109/00365527809181780.