• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液透析导管相关纤维蛋白鞘:低剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂输注治疗

Hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths: treatment with a low-dose rt-PA infusion.

作者信息

Savader S J, Haikal L C, Ehrman K O, Porter D J, Oteham A C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Oct;11(9):1131-6. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61353-0.

DOI:10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61353-0
PMID:11041468
Abstract

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of a low-dose, 3-hour recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) infusion for the treatment of hemodialysis catheter (HDC)-associated fibrin sheaths.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with end-stage renal disease (female, n = 11; male, n = 6), who were undergoing catheter-directed hemodialysis, were evaluated for 28 episodes of HDC dysfunction. This patient group ranged in age from 25 to 92 years (mean, 57 years). Radiographic contrast and/or clinical evaluation were consistent with the presence of a fibrin sheath on either the arterial and/or venous port in all cases. Patients subsequently underwent a thrombolytic infusion consisting of 2.5 mg rt-PA in 50 mL normal saline at a rate of 17 mL/h (3-hour infusion) per port. All infusions were performed in the interventional radiology recovery room, on an outpatient basis. Patients were followed-up prospectively for technical success, complications, catheter patency, and long-term outcome.

RESULTS

The immediate technical success rate, defined as return of manual aspiration and infusion capabilities to both ports, was 100%. No potential patients required exclusion from thrombolytic therapy secondary to contraindications, and no procedure-related complications occurred. The arithmetic mean and median catheter patency at the end of the study was 41 and 25 days, respectively (range, 1-116 days). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis yielded a 30-, 60-, and 90-day probability of patency of 0.67, 0.61, and 0.51, respectively. At the end of the study period, all 17 patients remained on catheter-directed hemodialysis and 13 (76%) were utilizing the same catheter present at the time of entrance into the study.

CONCLUSION

Thrombolytic therapy utilizing a 2.5-mg rt-PA infusion through each port during a 3-hour period would appear to be a safe, efficient method for treating HDC-associated fibrin sheaths. Three-month patency rates are comparable to those reported for other methods of restoring function to HDC catheters, including new catheter placement, catheter exchange over a guide wire, thrombolytic infusions with urokinase, and percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping.

摘要

目的

前瞻性评估低剂量、3小时重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)输注治疗血液透析导管(HDC)相关纤维蛋白鞘的疗效。

材料与方法

对17例接受导管导向血液透析的终末期肾病患者(女性11例,男性6例)进行了28次HDC功能障碍评估。该患者组年龄在25至92岁之间(平均57岁)。所有病例的影像学造影和/或临床评估均显示动脉和/或静脉端口存在纤维蛋白鞘。患者随后接受溶栓输注,每个端口以17 mL/h的速率(3小时输注)在50 mL生理盐水中注入2.5 mg rt-PA。所有输注均在门诊基础上于介入放射学恢复室进行。对患者进行前瞻性随访,观察技术成功率、并发症、导管通畅情况和长期预后。

结果

即时技术成功率,即两个端口手动抽吸和输注功能均恢复,为100%。没有潜在患者因禁忌症而被排除在溶栓治疗之外,也没有发生与操作相关的并发症。研究结束时导管通畅的算术平均值和中位数分别为41天和25天(范围1-116天)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析得出30天、60天和90天的通畅概率分别为0.67、0.61和0.51。在研究期结束时,所有17例患者仍接受导管导向血液透析,13例(76%)使用研究开始时的同一根导管。

结论

在3小时内通过每个端口输注2.5 mg rt-PA进行溶栓治疗似乎是治疗HDC相关纤维蛋白鞘的一种安全、有效的方法。三个月的通畅率与其他恢复HDC导管功能的方法(包括放置新导管、导丝引导下更换导管、尿激酶溶栓输注和经皮纤维蛋白鞘剥离)所报告的通畅率相当。

相似文献

1
Hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths: treatment with a low-dose rt-PA infusion.血液透析导管相关纤维蛋白鞘:低剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂输注治疗
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Oct;11(9):1131-6. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61353-0.
2
Treatment of hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths by rt-PA infusion: critical analysis of 124 procedures.通过rt-PA输注治疗血液透析导管相关纤维蛋白鞘:124例手术的批判性分析
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Jun;12(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61441-9.
3
Restoration of patency in failing tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping.失功带隧道血液透析导管通畅性的恢复:导管更换、纤维蛋白鞘更换及球囊破坏与股静脉剥脱术的比较
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Jun;17(6):1011-5. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000223692.99800.2e.
4
Percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion for malfunctioning well-positioned tunneled central venous dialysis catheters: a prospective, randomized trial.经皮纤维蛋白鞘剥脱术与经导管尿激酶输注治疗位置良好的带隧道中心静脉透析导管功能障碍:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Oct;11(9):1121-9. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61352-9.
5
Restoration of flow following haemodialysis catheter thrombus. Analysis of rt-PA infusion in tunnelled dialysis catheters.血液透析导管血栓形成后血流的恢复。隧道式透析导管中rt-PA输注的分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2004 Dec;29(6):517-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2004.00581.x.
6
Reteplase for dysfunctional hemodialysis catheter clearance.瑞替普酶用于功能失调的血液透析导管清除。
Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Feb;23(2):137-41. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.2.137.32086.
7
Fibrin sheath stripping versus catheter exchange for the treatment of failed tunneled hemodialysis catheters: randomized clinical trial.纤维蛋白鞘剥除术与导管更换术治疗隧道式血液透析导管功能障碍:随机临床试验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Oct;11(9):1115-20. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61351-7.
8
Utility of percutaneous intervention in the management of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.经皮介入在带隧道血液透析导管管理中的应用
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003 Jan-Feb;26(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s00270-002-2603-8. Epub 2002 Oct 24.
9
Comparison of intensive versus standard hemodialysis central venous catheter dysfunction protocol using rt-PA: a quality assurance initiative.使用rt-PA的强化与标准血液透析中心静脉导管功能障碍处理方案的比较:一项质量保证举措。
J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):143-50. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000501. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
10
Efficacy of percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping in restoring patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.经皮纤维蛋白鞘剥脱术恢复带隧道血液透析导管通畅性的疗效
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Oct;173(4):1023-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.4.10511171.

引用本文的文献

1
Reevaluation of lock solutions for Central venous catheters in hemodialysis: a narrative review.血液透析中中心静脉导管固定方案的再评估:叙述性综述。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):1501-1518. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2118068.
2
Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis.中心静脉端口导管中的纤维蛋白鞘:门诊低剂量单次注射尿激酶治疗
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jan 24;13:111-115. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S125130. eCollection 2017.
3
Use of tissue plasminogen activator in catheters used for extracorporeal renal replacement therapy.
组织纤溶酶原激活剂在用于体外肾脏替代治疗的导管中的应用。
J Vet Intern Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(2):270-6. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12296. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
4
K/DOQI Guidelines: What Should an Interventionalist Know?《K/DOQI指南:介入医师应该了解什么?》
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004 Jun;21(2):119-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-833685.
5
Prevention of catheter lumen occlusion with rT-PA versus heparin (Pre-CLOT): study protocol of a randomized trial [ISRCTN35253449].重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与肝素预防导管腔阻塞(Pre-CLOT):一项随机试验的研究方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号35253449]
BMC Nephrol. 2006 Apr 11;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-7-8.