Suppr超能文献

使用rt-PA的强化与标准血液透析中心静脉导管功能障碍处理方案的比较:一项质量保证举措。

Comparison of intensive versus standard hemodialysis central venous catheter dysfunction protocol using rt-PA: a quality assurance initiative.

作者信息

Wilson Jo-Anne S, Mossop Paula, Soroka Steven D, Dipchand Christine, Drost Sarah, Sheehy Niall, Tennankore Karthik

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority Central Zone, Halifax, Nova Scotia - Canada.

College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia - Canada.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):143-50. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000501. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Catheter locking solutions such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) are used to treat and prevent clotting of hemodialysis (HD) catheters during HD treatments and the interdialytic period. However, evidence to guide the use of rt-PA for catheter dysfunction is limited.

METHODS

We evaluated outcomes using two catheter dysfunction protocols in a cohort of consecutive prevalent dialysis patients (Jan 2013 to Sep 2014) undergoing HD with a tunneled catheter. In the intensive protocol, rt-PA was administered to all catheters based on blood flow and/or line reversal. In the standard protocol, rt-PA administration was based only on blood flow. The primary outcome was the rate of rt-PA use for catheter malfunction (rt-PA treatment days/1000 total line days; [TLD]). Secondary outcomes included the cost of rt-PA/TLD and the rate of catheter-related bacteremia.

RESULTS

There were 26 and 35 patients managed by the intensive and standard protocols, respectively. The rate of rt-PA use was 52/1000 TLD (intensive) versus 39/1000 TLD (standard) (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.12-1.52 CI, p<0.001). The rate of bacteremia was 0.43 and 0.22/1000 TLD for the intensive and standard protocols, respectively (p = 0.491). The cost of rt-PA was CDN $5.58 and CDN $6.15 per TLD for the intensive protocol and standard protocol groups (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Managing catheter dysfunction based on line reversal and blood flow as opposed to only blood flow was associated with a higher rate of rt-PA use, but at a reduced overall cost.

摘要

目的

诸如重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)之类的导管封管溶液用于在血液透析(HD)治疗期间及透析间期治疗和预防HD导管凝血。然而,指导使用rt-PA治疗导管功能障碍的证据有限。

方法

我们在一组连续的接受隧道式导管HD治疗的透析患者(2013年1月至2014年9月)中,使用两种导管功能障碍方案评估结果。在强化方案中,根据血流量和/或管路反流情况,对所有导管使用rt-PA。在标准方案中,仅根据血流量使用rt-PA。主要结局是rt-PA用于导管故障的使用率(rt-PA治疗天数/1000总管路天数;[TLD])。次要结局包括rt-PA/TLD的成本以及导管相关菌血症的发生率。

结果

分别有26例和35例患者采用强化方案和标准方案进行治疗。rt-PA使用率为52/1000 TLD(强化方案)对39/1000 TLD(标准方案)(率比1.30,95%CI 1.12-1.52,p<0.001)。强化方案和标准方案的菌血症发生率分别为0.43和0.22/1000 TLD(p = 0.491)。强化方案组和标准方案组rt-PA的成本分别为每TLD 5.58加元和6.15加元(p<0.001)。

结论

基于管路反流和血流量而非仅血流量来处理导管功能障碍,与较高的rt-PA使用率相关,但总成本降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验