Suppr超能文献

[用丁丙诺啡对多物质滥用者进行解毒治疗。对情感、焦虑和戒断症状的影响]

[Detoxification of poly-substance abusers with buprenorphine. Effects on affect, anxiety, and withdrawal symptoms].

作者信息

Paetzold W, Eronat V, Seifert J, Holze I, Emrich H M, Schneider U

机构信息

Abteilung Klinische Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2000 Sep;71(9):722-9. doi: 10.1007/s001150050656.

Abstract

We used an open-labeled, 21-day inpatient detoxification treatment to compare the short-term effects of a 10-day buprenorphine plus 19-day carbamazepine regimen (n = 15) to a 14-day oxazepam plus 19-day carbamazepine regimen (n = 12) during rapid detoxification from opioids and other abused drugs. Somatic and psychopathological changes were assessed using the following rating scales: ASI, HAMD, SCL-90-R, and SOWS. Eighteen of 27 patients (67%) completed the study. Four dropouts (27%) were treated with buprenorphine/carbamazepine (BPN/CBZ) and the other five dropouts (42%) were treated with oxazepam/carbamazepine (OXA/CBZ). Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that SOWS scores were significantly less pronounced with BPN-CBZ than with OXA/CBZ. On the first day of admission, no significant difference in HAMD scores was detected (BPN/CBZ 11.6, BPN/CBZ 1.0). On day 14, HAMD was significantly less pronounced in BPN/CBZ (3.0) than in OXA/CBZ (6.1). BPN/CBZ showed a significant improvement in the ASI score on days 7 and 14 compared with OXA/CBZ. Three of nine items of the SCL-90-R showed a trend toward less pronounced outcome in BPN-CBZ. No severe side effects occurred during treatment in either group. The buprenorphine/carbamazepine regimen provided significantly more effective relief from affect disturbances and withdrawal syndromes than the oxazepam/carbamazepine regimen. The pharmacological basis of these effects of buprenorphine (kappa-antagonism activity,mu-agonism activity) are discussed.

摘要

我们采用了一项开放标签的21天住院戒毒治疗,以比较在从阿片类药物和其他滥用药物中快速戒毒期间,10天丁丙诺啡加19天卡马西平方案(n = 15)与14天奥沙西泮加19天卡马西平方案(n = 12)的短期效果。使用以下评定量表评估躯体和精神病理学变化:成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、症状自评量表(SCL-90-R)和临床总体印象量表(SOWS)。27名患者中有18名(67%)完成了研究。4名退出者(27%)接受丁丙诺啡/卡马西平(BPN/CBZ)治疗,另外5名退出者(42%)接受奥沙西泮/卡马西平(OXA/CBZ)治疗。重复测量方差分析显示,与OXA/CBZ相比,BPN-CBZ的SOWS评分明显更低。入院第一天,未检测到HAMD评分有显著差异(BPN/CBZ为11.6,OXA/CBZ为1.0)。在第14天,BPN/CBZ的HAMD评分(3.0)明显低于OXA/CBZ(6.1)。与OXA/CBZ相比,BPN/CBZ在第7天和第14天的ASI评分有显著改善。SCL-90-R的9个项目中有3个显示BPN-CBZ的结果有减轻的趋势。两组治疗期间均未出现严重副作用。与奥沙西泮/卡马西平方案相比,丁丙诺啡/卡马西平方案在缓解情感障碍和戒断综合征方面明显更有效。文中讨论了丁丙诺啡这些作用(κ-拮抗活性、μ-激动活性)的药理学基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验