• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient priorities with traumatic lacerations.

作者信息

Singer A J, Mach C, Thode H C, Hemachandra S, Shofer F S, Hollander J E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;18(6):683-6. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2000.16312.

DOI:10.1053/ajem.2000.16312
PMID:11043622
Abstract

Clinical trials should use outcomes that are important to patients. We sought to determine the aspects of laceration management that are most important to patients. A prospective observational survey was conducted at one suburban and one urban university ED during November to December 1998 that included ED patients and visitors with and without current or prior lacerations. Trained research assistants approached 747 people of which 724 (97%) completed a 25-item closed question survey that evaluated demographics, prior laceration repairs, and assessed the relative importance of least painful repair, ED length of stay, cosmetic outcome, functional recovery, practitioner compassion, avoidance of wound infection, total costs, and missed days of work or school using a five-item Likert scale (not important-extremely important). Additionally, the relative importance of these items was compared. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven hundred twenty-four people participated; 383 (53%) had prior lacerations; 92 (14%) had lacerations at the time of the survey. The most important aspect of care for respondents were normal function (28%), avoiding infection (20%), cosmetic outcome (17%), and least painful repair (17%). Based on Likert scale data, most important aspects of care were: avoiding wound infection (mean [95% CI], 4.58 [4.52 to 4.64]), normal function (4.54 [4.48 to 4.6]), cosmetic outcome (3.78 [3.68 to 3.88]), and least painful repair (3.84 [3.76 to 3.92]). Cost, length of stay, missed work/school, and compassion were less important (range, 3.0 to 3.7). Patients with facial lacerations chose cosmetic outcome as the most important aspect of care while all others chose function. Patients prioritize the medical outcomes of laceration repair (function, avoiding infection, cosmesis, pain) more than cost, compassion, ED length of stay and inconvenience (missed work/school). Cosmetic outcome is particularly important to patients with facial lacerations. This information should be useful when designing outcome studies of laceration management.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient priorities with traumatic lacerations.
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;18(6):683-6. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2000.16312.
2
Tissue adhesives for simple traumatic lacerations.用于简单外伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):222-4. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.222.
3
Randomized controlled comparison of cosmetic outcomes of simple facial lacerations closed with Steri Strip Skin Closures or Dermabond tissue adhesive.使用皮肤免缝胶带或皮肤黏合剂闭合单纯面部裂伤的美容效果随机对照比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Aug;20(8):519-24. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000136068.45198.ae.
4
A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.一项随机对照试验,比较用可吸收的普通肠线与不可吸收的尼龙缝线修复小儿外伤性撕裂伤的长期美容效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):730-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.029.
5
Irrigation in facial and scalp lacerations: does it alter outcome?面部和头皮裂伤的冲洗:它会改变结局吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jan;31(1):73-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70284-7.
6
Outcomes of laceration suture repair in the emergency department.急诊科裂伤缝合修复的结果
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Apr;33(2):242-249. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13600. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Risk factors for infection in patients with traumatic lacerations.创伤性撕裂伤患者感染的危险因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;8(7):716-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00190.x.
8
Comparison of patient satisfaction and practitioner satisfaction with wound appearance after traumatic wound repair.
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Feb;4(2):133-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03720.x.
9
Long-term evaluation of cosmetic appearance of repaired lacerations: validation of telephone assessment. The Stony Brook Wound Registry Study Group.修复裂伤后外观的长期评估:电话评估的验证。石溪伤口登记研究小组。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jan;31(1):92-8.
10
Comparison of tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of lacerations in the emergency department.急诊科组织黏合剂与缝合术在撕裂伤修复中的比较。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2002 Jun;9(2):155-8. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200206000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Sutures: Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO) and Scar Massage for Anatomical Restoration of Penetrating Upper Lip Laceration at the Vermilion-Cutaneous Junction in Primary Care-A Case Report.超越缝线:湿润烧伤膏(MEBO)与瘢痕按摩用于基层医疗中唇红 - 皮肤交界处穿透性上唇裂伤的解剖修复——病例报告
Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2025 Sep 1;18:11795476251370546. doi: 10.1177/11795476251370546. eCollection 2025.
2
Head and Neck Injuries Associated With Cell Phone Use.头部和颈部与手机使用相关的损伤。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Feb 1;146(2):122-127. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.3678.
3
Development of a Plastic Surgery Supply Cart: Patient Outcomes and Quality of Care.
整形手术供应推车的开发:患者结局与护理质量
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e2111. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002111. eCollection 2019 Feb.
4
Early Complications Following Facial Laceration Repair Performed by Emergency Physicians After One Year of Wound Closure Training.急诊医师在接受伤口缝合培训一年后进行面部裂伤修复的早期并发症
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Aug 16;2(4):259-268. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10115. eCollection 2018 Oct.
5
Satisfaction with facial laceration repair by provider specialty in the emergency department.急诊科不同专业提供者对面部裂伤修复的满意度
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 30;2(3):179-183. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.050. eCollection 2015 Sep.
6
The risk of wound infection after simple hand laceration.单纯手部裂伤后感染的风险。
World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(1):44-7. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.01.008.
7
A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.关于在医疗保健背景下对结果进行优先级排序方法的描述性综述。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1873-93. doi: 10.1111/hex.12256. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
Repigmentation of cutaneous scars depends on original wound type.皮肤瘢痕的复色取决于原始伤口类型。
J Anat. 2013 Jul;223(1):74-82. doi: 10.1111/joa.12052. Epub 2013 May 14.