Suppr超能文献

混合预稀释和后稀释在线血液透析滤过与传统输注模式的比较。

Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes.

作者信息

Pedrini L A, De Cristofaro V, Pagliari B, Samà F

机构信息

Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Sondrio, Sondrio, Italy.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2000 Nov;58(5):2155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2000.00389.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On postdilution hemodiafiltration (post-HDF), convective removal of medium-high molecular weight solutes is, at the highest ultrafiltration rates, limited by high blood viscosity and protein concentration. Prefilter reinfusion (pre-HDF) may overcome this problem, but plasma dilution may affect the overall efficiency of the technique. In this study, an experimental system of online HDF with combined prefilter and postfilter infusion (mixed HDF) was evaluated and compared with the traditional predilution and postdilution modes.

METHODS

Removal of urea (U), creatinine (Cr), phosphate (Phos), and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)m), ultrafiltration coefficients of the dialyzer (K(UF)), and rheologic conditions of the blood circuit were evaluated during the three infusion modes (a total of 36 runs lasting 180 min), performed with a polysulfone hemofilter 1.8 m(2), blood flow (Q(b)) 400 mL/min, dialysate flow (Q(d)) 700 mL/min, and infusion rate 120 mL/min (pre-HDF and post-HDF), or 60 + 60 mL/min (mixed HDF).

RESULTS

The mean effective U and Cr clearances and urea index of dialysis dose (eKt/V) were significantly higher on post-HDF than on pre-HDF (K(WB) (U) 210 vs. 193 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 152 vs. 142 mL/min, eKt/V 1.41 vs. 1.30), while mixed HDF did not show significant differences versus post-HDF (K(WB) (U) 201 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 149 mL/min). K(DQ) for Phos and beta(2)m were higher on post-HDF in only absolute values. Similar differences were found for instantaneous dialyzer clearances (K(I)) at 60, 120, and 180 minutes of the sessions, with a common trend to decrease with time. K(UF) and the apparent beta(2)m sieving coefficient showed their lowest values toward the end of post-HDF sessions. Increasing filtration fractions (FFs) were associated with increasing transmembrane pressure (TMP) and solute clearances up to FF values of 0.45. These were values achieved in only post-HDF, at which point the curve of the relationship between TMP and FF assumed its steepest exponential trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed HDF, by better preserving the characteristics of water and solute transport of the membrane, ensured safer operating conditions than post-HDF, while achieving similar removal of small- and large-size solutes. Optimizing the ratio of prefilter/postfilter infusion and the total infusion according to the relationships found in our study between solute clearances, FF, and TMP, convective flux and transport may avoid excessive hemoconcentration and dangerous pressure gradients.

摘要

背景

在后置稀释血液透析滤过(post - HDF)中,在最高超滤率下,中高分子量溶质的对流清除受高血液粘度和蛋白质浓度限制。预滤器再输注(pre - HDF)可能克服这一问题,但血浆稀释可能影响该技术的整体效率。在本研究中,对一种带有预滤器和后滤器联合输注的在线血液透析滤过(混合HDF)实验系统进行了评估,并与传统的前置稀释和后置稀释模式进行了比较。

方法

在三种输注模式(共36次运行,每次持续180分钟)期间,评估了尿素(U)、肌酐(Cr)、磷酸盐(Phos)和β2微球蛋白(β2m)的清除情况、透析器的超滤系数(K(UF))以及血液回路的流变学状况。实验采用1.8 m²的聚砜血液滤过器,血流速(Q(b))400 mL/分钟,透析液流速(Q(d))700 mL/分钟,输注速率为120 mL/分钟(pre - HDF和post - HDF),或60 + 60 mL/分钟(混合HDF)。

结果

post - HDF的平均有效U和Cr清除率以及透析剂量的尿素指数(eKt/V)显著高于pre - HDF(K(WB) (U) 210对193 mL/分钟,K(DQ) (Cr) 152对142 mL/分钟,eKt/V 1.41对1.30),而混合HDF与post - HDF相比无显著差异(K(WB) (U) 201 mL/分钟,K(DQ) (Cr) 149 mL/分钟)。仅在绝对值上,post - HDF的Phos和β2m的K(DQ)更高。在治疗的60、120和180分钟时,瞬时透析器清除率(K(I))也发现了类似差异,且都有随时间下降的共同趋势。在post - HDF治疗接近结束时,K(UF)和表观β2m筛过系数显示出最低值。增加滤过分数(FF)与跨膜压(TMP)和溶质清除率增加相关,直至FF值达到0.45。这些值仅在post - HDF中实现,此时TMP与FF之间关系曲线呈现最陡峭的指数趋势。

结论

混合HDF通过更好地保留膜的水和溶质转运特性,确保了比post - HDF更安全的操作条件,同时实现了对大小溶质的类似清除。根据我们研究中发现的溶质清除率、FF和TMP之间的关系,优化预滤器/后滤器输注比例和总输注量,对流通量和转运可避免过度血液浓缩和危险的压力梯度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验