Colussi Giacomo, Frattini Gianmaria
U.O. Nefrologia, A.O. Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.
Hemodial Int. 2007 Jan;11(1):76-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00157.x.
In hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF), removal of medium and high-molecular-weight solutes is greatly enhanced by convective mechanisms as compared with simple diffusion; increasing convective flows may allow greater removal rates of these solutes. Use of "predilution" (pre-H[D]F) may allow higher ultrafiltration rates than the "postdilution" mode (post-H[D]F); yet, the dilution of plasma water may have unpredictable effects on "endogenous" water convection. We have applied a mathematical analysis to evaluate and compare endogenous water convective flow rates in pre-H(D)F vs. post-H(D)F. Endogenous plasma water recovered in ultrafiltrate was calculated according to patient (hematocrit, total protein level) and session parameters (blood flow, ultrafiltration rate, programmed weight loss), in absolute terms and as a fraction of endogenous plasma water delivery to the filter. Maximally efficient post-H(D)F was modelled according to a preset postfilter hematocrit or filtration fraction. Nomograms were constructed expressing endogenous water convective fluxes in relation to parameters of interest (ultrafiltration rate, blood flow, hematocrit) with both post-H(D)F and pre-H(D)F, and "efficiency" of pre-H(D)F vs. post-H(D)F (as the ratio of endogenous water convective flow rate with the 2 techniques) as a function of the ultrafiltration/reinfusion rate. In post-H(D)F, the model predicts maximal ultrafiltration rates within the limits of a preset hemoconcentration at the filter outlet; additionally, the model allows to calculate ultrafiltration/reinfusion quantities to be set in pre-H(D)F to equal and overcome maximal convective efficiency of post-H(D)F. This "equivalence" ultrafiltration rate may greatly vary according to patient's hematocrit and blood flow, so that the ultrafiltrate-reinfusate volume available in the system dictates, in any patient, which mode of reinfusion may attain higher "endogenous" convective flow rates. Pre-H(D)F may allow higher fractional and absolute "endogenous" convective flow rates as compared with post-H(D)F, provided that adequate amounts of reinfusate are available. For lower reinfusate volumes than "equivalence" values, post-H(D)F remains a better option.
在血液滤过(HF)和血液透析滤过(HDF)中,与单纯扩散相比,对流机制能极大地增强中、高分子量溶质的清除;增加对流流速可能使这些溶质的清除率更高。采用“预稀释”(预H[D]F)可能比“后稀释”模式(后H[D]F)允许更高的超滤率;然而,血浆水的稀释可能对“内源性”水对流产生不可预测的影响。我们应用了数学分析来评估和比较预H(D)F与后H(D)F中的内源性水对流流速。根据患者(血细胞比容、总蛋白水平)和治疗参数(血流量、超滤率、设定的体重减轻),以绝对值并作为输送到滤器的内源性血浆水的一部分,计算超滤液中回收的内源性血浆水。根据预设的滤器后血细胞比容或滤过分数对最大效率的后H(D)F进行建模。构建了列线图,以表示后H(D)F和预H(D)F中与感兴趣参数(超滤率、血流量、血细胞比容)相关的内源性水对流通量,以及预H(D)F与后H(D)F的“效率”(作为两种技术的内源性水对流流速之比)作为超滤/再输注率的函数。在后H(D)F中,该模型预测在滤器出口预设血液浓缩限度内的最大超滤率;此外,该模型允许计算在预H(D)F中设置的超滤/再输注量,以等于并超过后H(D)F的最大对流效率。这种“等效”超滤率可能因患者的血细胞比容和血流量而有很大差异,因此系统中可用的超滤液 - 再输注液体积决定了在任何患者中哪种再输注模式可实现更高的“内源性”对流流速。与后H(D)F相比,只要有足够量的再输注液,预H(D)F可能允许更高的分数和绝对“内源性”对流流速。对于低于“等效”值的再输注液体积,后H(D)F仍然是更好的选择。