Broadbear J T, Keyser B B
Illinois State University, Normal 61790, USA.
J Sch Health. 2000 Oct;70(8):322-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb07266.x.
Teaching for critical thinking represents a vital and emerging priority in school health education. A variety of conceptions of critical thinking and approaches to teaching for critical thinking exist in the literature. This paper explores the relevance of Richard Paul's concept of critical thinking to health education. Paul's work on critical thinking has been widely disseminated and features three inter-related components called the elements of reasoning, intellectual standards, and intellectual traits. Each component appears highly relevant to health education. Paul's approach is also based on natural rather than technical language which improves its utility in learning. Unanswered questions about the approach concern the degree to which the thinking skills and traits can be transferred to health instruction and the lack of evaluation research demonstrating its efficacy. Further inquiry into the applicability and efficacy of the approach is needed.
培养批判性思维是学校健康教育中一项至关重要且新兴的优先任务。文献中存在多种关于批判性思维的概念以及培养批判性思维的教学方法。本文探讨了理查德·保罗的批判性思维概念与健康教育的相关性。保罗关于批判性思维的著作已广泛传播,其包含三个相互关联的组成部分,即推理要素、智力标准和智力特质。每个组成部分似乎都与健康教育高度相关。保罗的方法还基于自然语言而非专业术语,这提高了其在学习中的实用性。关于该方法尚未解答的问题包括思维技能和特质能够在多大程度上转化为健康教学,以及缺乏评估其有效性的研究。需要对该方法的适用性和有效性进行进一步探究。