Plack Margaret M, Goldman Ellen F, Scott Andrea R, Pintz Christine, Herrmann Debra, Kline Kathleen, Thompson Tracey, Brundage Shelley B
a Department of Physical Therapy and Health Care Sciences , School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University , Washington, DC , USA.
b Department of Human and Organizational Learning , Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University , Washington, DC , USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):242-254. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1398654. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Phenomenon: Systems thinking is the cornerstone of systems-based practice (SBP) and a core competency in medicine and health sciences. Literature regarding how to teach or apply systems thinking in practice is limited. This study aimed to understand how educators in medicine, physical therapy, physician assistant, nursing, and speech-language pathology education programs teach and assess systems thinking and SBP.
Twenty-six educators from seven different degree programs across the five professions were interviewed and program descriptions and relevant course syllabi were reviewed. Qualitative analysis was iterative and incorporated inductive and deductive methods as well as a constant comparison of units of data to identify patterns and themes.
Six themes were identified: 1) participants described systems thinking as ranging across four major levels of healthcare (i.e., patient, care team, organization, and external environment); 2) participants associated systems thinking with a wide range of activities across the curriculum including quality improvement, Inter-professional education (IPE), error mitigation, and advocacy; 3) the need for healthcare professionals to understand systems thinking was primarily externally driven; 4) participants perceived that learning systems thinking occurred mainly informally and experientially rather than through formal didactic instruction; 5) participants characterized systems thinking content as interspersed across the curriculum and described a variety of strategies for teaching and assessing it; 6) participants indicated a structured framework and inter-professional approach may enhance teaching and assessment of systems thinking. Insights: Systems thinking means different things to different health professionals. Teaching and assessing systems thinking across the health professions will require further training and practice. Tools, techniques, taxonomies and expertise outside of healthcare may be used to enhance the teaching, assessment, and application of systems thinking and SBP to clinical practice; however, these would need to be adapted and refined for use in healthcare.
现象:系统思维是基于系统的实践(SBP)的基石,也是医学和健康科学领域的一项核心能力。关于如何在实践中教授或应用系统思维的文献有限。本研究旨在了解医学、物理治疗、医师助理、护理和言语语言病理学教育项目的教育工作者如何教授和评估系统思维及SBP。
对来自五个专业的七个不同学位项目的26名教育工作者进行了访谈,并审查了项目描述和相关课程大纲。定性分析采用迭代方式,结合归纳和演绎方法以及对数据单元的持续比较,以识别模式和主题。
确定了六个主题:1)参与者将系统思维描述为涵盖医疗保健的四个主要层面(即患者、护理团队、组织和外部环境);2)参与者将系统思维与课程中的广泛活动相关联,包括质量改进、跨专业教育(IPE)、错误缓解和宣传;3)医疗保健专业人员理解系统思维的需求主要是由外部驱动的;4)参与者认为系统思维的学习主要是非正式和体验式的,而非通过正式的讲授式教学;5)参与者将系统思维内容描述为分散在课程中,并描述了多种教授和评估它的策略;6)参与者表示结构化框架和跨专业方法可能会加强系统思维的教学和评估。见解:系统思维对不同的健康专业人员意味着不同的东西。在整个健康专业领域教授和评估系统思维将需要进一步的培训和实践。医疗保健领域之外的工具、技术、分类法和专业知识可用于加强系统思维及SBP在临床实践中的教学、评估和应用;然而,这些需要进行调整和完善以用于医疗保健领域。