Suppr超能文献

通过靶控输注比较丙泊酚和咪达唑仑在两种镇静水平下对记忆的影响。

A comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on memory during two levels of sedation by using target-controlled infusion.

作者信息

de Roode A, van Gerven J M, Schoemaker R C, Engbers F H, Olieman W, Kroon J R, Cohen A F, Bovill J G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. A.de@

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2000 Nov;91(5):1056-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200011000-00003.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We examined memory during sedation with target-controlled infusions of propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded five-way, cross-over study in 10 volunteers. Each active drug infusion was targeted to sedation level 1 (asleep) and level 4 (lethargic) as determined with the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. At the target level of sedation, drug concentration was clamped for 30 min, during which time neutral words were presented. After 2 h, explicit memory was assessed by recall, and implicit memory by using a wordstem completion test. Venous drug concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 1350 ng/mL (+/-332 ng/mL) for propofol and 208 ng/mL (+/-112 ng/mL) for midazolam during Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale level 4; and 1620 ng/mL (+/-357 ng/mL) and 249 ng/mL (+/-82 ng/mL) respectively during level 1. The wordstem completion test frequencies at low level sedation were significantly higher than spontaneous frequencies (8.7% + 2.4%; P: < 0.05 in all cases), and lower than during placebo (33.6% + 23%) (P: < 0.05 in all cases, except P: = 0.076 for propofol at level 4). Clinically distinct levels of sedation were accompanied by small differences in venous propofol or midazolam concentrations. This indicates steep concentration-effect relationships. Neutral information is still memorized during low-level sedation with both drugs. The memory effect of propofol and midazolam did not differ significantly.

IMPLICATIONS

Implicit memory can occur during different states of consciousness and might lead to psychological damage. In 10 volunteers, implicit memory was investigated during sedation with propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. To compare the effects of both drugs, they were titrated using a computer-controlled infusion system to produce similar high and low levels of sedation.

摘要

未标注

在一项针对10名志愿者的双盲五交叉研究中,我们使用丙泊酚和咪达唑仑的靶控输注来研究镇静期间的记忆情况。每种活性药物输注的目标是根据观察者警觉/镇静评估量表确定的镇静水平1(入睡)和水平4(嗜睡)。在目标镇静水平下,药物浓度保持30分钟不变,在此期间呈现中性词。2小时后,通过回忆评估外显记忆,通过词干补全测试评估内隐记忆。在观察者警觉/镇静评估量表水平4时,丙泊酚的静脉药物浓度(均值±标准差)为1350 ng/mL(±332 ng/mL),咪达唑仑为208 ng/mL(±112 ng/mL);在水平1时,分别为1620 ng/mL(±357 ng/mL)和249 ng/mL(±82 ng/mL)。低水平镇静时的词干补全测试频率显著高于自发频率(8.7% + 2.4%;所有情况下P:< 0.05),且低于安慰剂组(33.6% + 23%)(除丙泊酚在水平4时P = 0.076外,所有情况下P:< 0.05)。临床上不同的镇静水平伴随着丙泊酚或咪达唑仑静脉浓度的微小差异。这表明浓度-效应关系陡峭。在两种药物的低水平镇静期间,中性信息仍会被记忆。丙泊酚和咪达唑仑的记忆效应无显著差异。

启示

内隐记忆可能在不同意识状态下发生,并可能导致心理损伤。在一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,对10名志愿者在使用丙泊酚和咪达唑仑镇静期间的内隐记忆进行了研究。为比较两种药物的效果,使用计算机控制的输注系统对它们进行滴定,以产生相似的高、低水平镇静。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验