Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与咪达唑仑等剂量输注用于脊髓麻醉期间清醒镇静的比较——一项前瞻性随机研究。

A comparison of equisedative infusions of propofol and midazolam for conscious sedation during spinal anesthesia - a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Patki Abhiruchi, Shelgaonkar V C

机构信息

Lecturer, Department of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Mayo Hospital, Nagpur, M.S., India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):47-53.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Supplemental sedation with an intravenous agent is often required to allay fear and anxiety in patients subjected to spinal anesthesia .We studied and compared the properties of propofol and midazolam as equisedative continuous infusions. PATIENTS #ENTITYSTARTX00026;

METHODS

100, ASA grade 1 and 2 patients, 18 to 60 years of age, undergoing spinal anesthesia, were randomly allocated to receive either propofol 1mg/ml or midazolam 0.1mg/ml in 50ml syringes through syringe pump. The infusion rates were titrated in order to maintain a desired sedation score of 4 on the Observer's assessment of alertness/ sedation scale. Anxiety score was assessed at regular intervals by a single observer in all cases, using a 100mm visual analog scale.Intraoperative and postoperative amnesia was assessed using visual task of recall of pictures and verbal task of recall of words.

RESULTS

Propofol infusion was found to be superior to that of midazolam as it showed a statistically significant faster onset in achieving the desired sedation score, significantly lower mean anxiety scores, a clear headed, rapid recovery and significantly lesser postoperative impairment of recall, but midazolam infusion was seen to be associated with deeper intraoperative amnesia over the former which was beneficial.

CONCLUSION

Equisedatine infusion of propofol & midazolam as an adjunct & spinal anesthesia offer good anxiolysis and cardio respiratory stability. Propofol her faster onset & recovery while midazolam provides better intraoperative annesia.

摘要

背景

在接受脊髓麻醉的患者中,通常需要静脉注射药物进行辅助镇静,以减轻恐惧和焦虑。我们研究并比较了丙泊酚和咪达唑仑作为等效镇静持续输注药物的特性。

患者与方法

100例年龄在18至60岁之间、ASA分级为1级和2级且接受脊髓麻醉的患者,通过注射泵随机分配接受50ml注射器中1mg/ml的丙泊酚或0.1mg/ml的咪达唑仑。输注速率进行滴定,以在观察者警觉/镇静量表评估中维持所需的4分镇静评分。在所有病例中,由一名观察者定期使用100mm视觉模拟量表评估焦虑评分。使用图片回忆视觉任务和单词回忆语言任务评估术中及术后遗忘情况。

结果

发现丙泊酚输注优于咪达唑仑输注,因为它在达到所需镇静评分方面起效更快,具有统计学意义,平均焦虑评分显著更低,清醒、恢复迅速,术后回忆障碍显著更小,但咪达唑仑输注与比丙泊酚更深的术中遗忘有关,这是有益的。

结论

丙泊酚和咪达唑仑等效镇静输注作为脊髓麻醉的辅助用药,具有良好的抗焦虑作用和心肺稳定性。丙泊酚起效更快且恢复更快,而咪达唑仑提供更好的术中遗忘效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1237/3146158/1b17de84616d/JOACP-27-47-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验